Paper · 2010 · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Effects of sodium molybdate foliar sprays on molybdenum concentration in the vegetative and reproductive structures and on yield components of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot

M. L. LONGBOTTOM; P. R. DRY; M. SEDGLEY

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
20
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background and Aims: Molybdenum deficiency(Mo-deficiency) has been suggested to be the cause of poor yield of own-rooted Merlot vines in Australia. The aims of these experiments were to quantify the effect of foliar molybdenum treatment (Mo-treatment) on vine molybdenum status and to identify which components of yield are affected by Mo-treatment. Methods and Results: Experiments were conducted on own-rooted Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot in South Australia in 2003–07. Vines were sprayed with two rates of sodium molybdate (0, 0.101 and 0.202 g/vine) in the spring. Vine molybdenum status was assessed at flowering and juice molybdenum concentration was measured at harvest. The effects of Mo-treatment on vine growth and yield were also measured. Mo-treatment significantly increased yield of molybdenum deficient vines, a function of improved fruitset. Mo-treatment significantly increased the concentration of molybdenum in the petioles, shoot tips and inflorescences compared with the controls. Budburst was delayed on molybdenum-treated vines in the spring following Mo-treatment. The concentration of molybdenum in grape juice only increased in vines that had sufficient molybdenum. Conclusions: Mo-treatment increased vine molybdenum status; however, yield only increased on Mo-deficient vines. The increase in yield was a function of improved fruitset. Significance of the Study: This research demonstrates a significant positive relationship between vine molybdenum status and fruitset of own-rooted Merlot vines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum foliar treatment significantly raised yield of deficient Merlot vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Mo-treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
molybdenum deficient vinese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mo-treatment significantly increased yield of molybdenum deficient vines, a function of improved fruitset.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum treatment improved fruit set of deficient vines, explaining yield increase.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Mo-treatmente0
Outcome
fruitsete0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
molybdenum deficient vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mo-treatment significantly increased yield of molybdenum deficient vines, a function of improved fruitset.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum treatment significantly increased molybdenum concentration in petioles versus controls.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
petiolese0
Treatment
Mo-treatmente0
Outcome
concentration of molybdenume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mo-treatment significantly increased the concentration of molybdenum in the petioles, shoot tips and inflorescences compared with the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum treatment significantly increased molybdenum concentration in shoot tips versus controls.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
shoot tipse0
Treatment
Mo-treatmente0
Outcome
concentration of molybdenume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mo-treatment significantly increased the concentration of molybdenum in the petioles, shoot tips and inflorescences compared with the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum treatment significantly increased molybdenum concentration in inflorescences versus controls.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
inflorescencese0
Treatment
Mo-treatmente0
Outcome
concentration of molybdenume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mo-treatment significantly increased the concentration of molybdenum in the petioles, shoot tips and inflorescences compared with the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Budburst was delayed in treated vines in the spring after molybdenum treatment.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Mo-treatmente0
Outcome
Budburste0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
spring following Mo-treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Budburst was delayed on molybdenum-treated vines in the spring following Mo-treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape juice molybdenum concentration increased only in vines with sufficient molybdenum.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
concentration of molybdenum in grape juicee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
vines that had sufficient molybdenume0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of molybdenum in grape juice only increased in vines that had sufficient molybdenum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increase from molybdenum treatment was confined to deficient vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Mo-deficient vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, yield only increased on Mo-deficient vines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum status and fruit set of own rooted Merlot vines were significantly positively associated.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Merlote0
Outcome
fruitsete0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
vine molybdenum statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research demonstrates a significant positive relationship between vine molybdenum status and fruitset of own-rooted Merlot vines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–157 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

molybdenum atom · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.