Abstract
In a field experiment, nematicides controlled the disease of sugarbeets caused by Heterodera schachtii and Fusarium oxysporum. Biocides that were both fungicidal and nematicidal also controlled the disease, but sugar yields were no higher than those obtained with the plain nematicides. In greenhouse experiments, the interaction between H. schachtii and F. oxysporam was disadvantageous to the nematode. Damage to sugarbeets was less when the fungus and the nematode were present than when only the nematode was present. The fungus inhibited nematode invasion and development in sugarbeet seedlings, thereby decreasing the number of nematodes that matured about 3-fold.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
In a field experiment, nematicides controlled sugarbeet disease caused by Heterodera schachtii and Fusarium oxysporum.
- Taxon
- sugarbeets
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1 - Treatment
- nematicidese1
- Interactor
- Heterodera schachtiiHeterodera schachtiie1pathogen
- Second interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium oxysporume1pathogen - Outcome
- diseasee1
- Direction
- controllede1
- Setting
- field experimente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“In a field experiment, nematicides controlled the disease of sugarbeets caused by Heterodera schachtii and Fusarium oxysporum”
Claim · model-written summary
Biocides that were both fungicidal and nematicidal also controlled the sugarbeet disease.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Biocides that were both fungicidal and nematicidale1
- Outcome
- diseasee1
- Direction
- controllede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeets”
e1“Biocides that were both fungicidal and nematicidal also controlled the disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar yields with fungicidal-nematicidal biocides were no higher than with plain nematicides.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Biocides that were both fungicidal and nematicidale1
- Outcome
- sugar yieldse1
- Direction
- no highere1
- Comparator
- plain nematicidese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeets”
e1“Biocides that were both fungicidal and nematicidal also controlled the disease, but sugar yields were no higher than those obtained with the plain nematicides”
Claim · model-written summary
In greenhouse experiments, damage to sugarbeets was less when the fungus and nematode were both present than when only the nematode was present.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- the fungus and the nematode were presente1
- Second interactor
- funguse1pathogen
- Outcome
- Damage to sugarbeetse1
- Direction
- lesse1
- Comparator
- only the nematode was presente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Damage to sugarbeets was less when the fungus and the nematode were present than when only the nematode was present”
Claim · model-written summary
The fungus inhibited nematode invasion and development in sugarbeet seedlings.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Organ / stage
- seedlingse1
- Treatment
- funguse1
- Second interactor
- funguse1pathogen
- Outcome
- nematode invasion and developmente1
- Direction
- inhibitede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The fungus inhibited nematode invasion and development in sugarbeet seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The fungus decreased the number of nematodes that matured about 3-fold in sugarbeet seedlings.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Organ / stage
- seedlingse1
- Treatment
- funguse1
- Second interactor
- funguse1pathogen
- Outcome
- number of nematodes that maturede1
- Direction
- decreasinge1
- Value
- 3-folde1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The fungus inhibited nematode invasion and development in sugarbeet seedlings, thereby decreasing the number of nematodes that matured about 3-fold”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · Heterodera schachtii · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →insecticide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fungicide · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fungicide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →insecticide · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.