Paper · 1993 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase Activity Increases during Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) Ripening (Implications for Fruit Softening)

R. J. Redgwell; S. C. Fry

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
135
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The activity of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET) was as-sayed in three tissue zones of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa [A. Chev.] C.F. Liang et A.R. Ferguson var deliciosa cv Hayward) at harvest and at several softening stages following a postharvest ethylene treatment. At harvest, extractable XET activity per unit fresh weight in the inner pericarp (IP) and core tissue was 4.5 and 42 times higher, respectively, than in the outer pericarp (OP). Within 24 h of ethylene treatment there was an increase in the activity and specific activity of XET in all tissues that continued throughout softening. Activity increased most in the OP, where it showed a 12-fold rise 6 d after ethylene treatment compared with 4.5- and 2.5-fold increases in the IP and core tissues, respectively. Visible swelling of the cell wall in each tissue was observed 24 h after the first detectable rise in XET activity and was most pronounced in the OP, which showed the greatest percentage increase in XET activity. Xyloglucan, galactoglucomannan, and cell wall materials isolated and purified from kiwifruit OP were tested as donor substrates for kiwifruit XET. The enzyme showed activity against xyloglucan but was inactive against galactoglucomannan. XET was active against cell wall materials from unripe and ripe fruit, with swollen walls from the latter being the better substrate. The results indicate that XET may have a key role early in fruit ripening, loosening the cell wall in preparation for further modification by other cell wall-associated enzymes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, inner pericarp XET activity was 4.5 times that of outer pericarp.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
inner pericarp (IP)e0
Gene
XETe0
Outcome
extractable XET activity per unit fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.5e0
Comparator
outer pericarp (OP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“At harvest, extractable XET activity per unit fresh weight in the inner pericarp (IP) and core tissue was 4.5 and 42 times higher, respectively, than in the outer pericarp (OP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–452 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, core XET activity was 42 times that of outer pericarp.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
core tissuee0
Gene
XETe0
Outcome
extractable XET activity per unit fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
42 timese0
Comparator
outer pericarp (OP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“At harvest, extractable XET activity per unit fresh weight in the inner pericarp (IP) and core tissue was 4.5 and 42 times higher, respectively, than in the outer pericarp (OP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XET activity and specific activity increased in all tissues within 24 hours of ethylene treatment and through softening.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
ethylene treatmente0
Gene
XETe0
Outcome
activity and specific activity of XETe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
Within 24 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Within 24 h of ethylene treatment there was an increase in the activity and specific activity of XET in all tissues that continued throughout softening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Outer pericarp XET activity rose 12-fold six days after ethylene.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
OPe0
Treatment
ethylene treatmente0
Outcome
Activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Activity increased most in the OP, where it showed a 12-fold rise 6 d after ethylene treatment compared with 4.5- and 2.5-fold increases in the IP and core tissues, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inner pericarp XET activity rose 4.5-fold after ethylene.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
IPe0
Treatment
ethylene treatmente0
Outcome
Activitye0
Direction
increasese0
Value
4.5-e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Activity increased most in the OP, where it showed a 12-fold rise 6 d after ethylene treatment compared with 4.5- and 2.5-fold increases in the IP and core tissues, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Core XET activity rose 2.5-fold after ethylene.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
core tissuese0
Treatment
ethylene treatmente0
Outcome
Activitye0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Activity increased most in the OP, where it showed a 12-fold rise 6 d after ethylene treatment compared with 4.5- and 2.5-fold increases in the IP and core tissues, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell walls swelled 24 hours after the first rise in XET activity, most strongly in outer pericarp.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
OPe0
Gene
XETe0
Outcome
Visible swelling of the cell walle0
Qualifier
24 h after the first detectable rise in XET activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Visible swelling of the cell wall in each tissue was observed 24 h after the first detectable rise in XET activity and was most pronounced in the OP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–933 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kiwifruit XET was active against xyloglucan.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Gene
The enzymee0
Outcome
activity against xyloglucane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The enzyme showed activity against xyloglucan but was inactive against galactoglucomannan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kiwifruit XET was inactive against galactoglucomannan.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Gene
The enzymee0
Outcome
inactive against galactoglucomannane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The enzyme showed activity against xyloglucan but was inactive against galactoglucomannan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XET was active against cell wall material from both unripe and ripe fruit, with ripe swollen walls the better substrate.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Gene
XETe0
Outcome
active against cell wall materials from unripe and ripe fruite0
Qualifier
swollen walls from the latter being the better substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“XET was active against cell wall materials from unripe and ripe fruit, with swollen walls from the latter being the better substrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1369 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer an early role for XET in cell wall loosening during ripening.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Gene
XETe0
Outcome
loosening the cell walle0
Qualifier
may have a key role early in fruit ripeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results indicate that XET may have a key role early in fruit ripening, loosening the cell wall in preparation for further modification by other cell wall-associated enzymes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1547 · show in text ↑

ethene · molecular: metabolites · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.