Abstract
Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum), oat (Avena sativa), and rye (Secale cereale) were compared in relation to soybean yield and population densities of Meloidogyne incognita, Paratrichodorus minor, Pratylenchus brachyurus, and Helicotylenchus spp. Soil population densities of all the nematode species in plots that had been planted to small grains in the winter did not differ from those in fallow plots in the spring. However, fall populations of Helicotylenchus spp. were more numerous in soybean plots following wheat and rye than in soybean plots following oat and fallow. Small grain rotations did not affect population densities of M. incognita juveniles, root-knot indices, plant heights or soybean yield. Meloidogyne incognita juveniles were more numerous, root-knot indices and plant heights were greater, and yields were lower in plots planted to the moderately M. incognita resistant soybean cultivar, Coker 488, than in plots planted to the
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Small grain rotations did not change soil population densities of the nematode species compared with fallow in spring
- Taxon
- Glycine max
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- small grains in the wintere2
- Outcome
- Soil population densitiese2
- Direction
- did not differe2
- Comparator
- fallow plots in the springe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e2“Soil population densities of all the nematode species in plots that had been planted to small grains in the winter did not differ from those in fallow plots in the spring”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall populations of Helicotylenchus spp. were higher after wheat and rye than after oat and fallow
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- wheat and ryee3
- Interactor
- Helicotylenchus spp.
Helicotylenchuse3pest - Outcome
- fall populations of Helicotylenchus spp.e3
- Direction
- more numerouse3
- Comparator
- oat and fallowe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e3“fall populations of Helicotylenchus spp. were more numerous in soybean plots following wheat and rye than in soybean plots following oat and fallow”
Claim · model-written summary
Small grain rotations did not affect population densities of M. incognita juveniles
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- Small grain rotationse4
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae4pest - Outcome
- population densities of M. incognita juvenilese4
- Direction
- did not affecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e4“Small grain rotations did not affect population densities of M. incognita juveniles, root-knot indices, plant heights or soybean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Small grain rotations did not affect root-knot indices
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- Small grain rotationse4
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
- Outcome
- root-knot indicese4
- Direction
- did not affecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e4“Small grain rotations did not affect population densities of M. incognita juveniles, root-knot indices, plant heights or soybean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Small grain rotations did not affect plant heights or soybean yield
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- Small grain rotationse4
- Outcome
- plant heights or soybean yielde4
- Direction
- did not affecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e4“Small grain rotations did not affect population densities of M. incognita juveniles, root-knot indices, plant heights or soybean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
M. incognita juveniles were more numerous in the moderately resistant cultivar Coker 488
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Material
- Coker 488e5
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae5pest
- Outcome
- Meloidogyne incognita juvenilese5
- Direction
- more numerouse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e5“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles were more numerous, root-knot indices and plant heights were greater, and yields were lower in plots planted to the moderately M. incognita resistant soybean cultivar, Coker 488”
Claim · model-written summary
Root-knot indices were greater in the moderately resistant cultivar Coker 488
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Material
- Coker 488e5
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae5pest
- Outcome
- root-knot indicese5
- Direction
- greatere5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e5“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles were more numerous, root-knot indices and plant heights were greater, and yields were lower in plots planted to the moderately M. incognita resistant soybean cultivar, Coker 488”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant heights were greater in the moderately resistant cultivar Coker 488
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Material
- Coker 488e5
- Outcome
- plant heightse5
- Direction
- greatere5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e5“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles were more numerous, root-knot indices and plant heights were greater, and yields were lower in plots planted to the moderately M. incognita resistant soybean cultivar, Coker 488”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yields were lower in the moderately resistant cultivar Coker 488
- Taxon
- Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
- Material
- Coker 488e5
- Outcome
- yieldse5
- Direction
- lowere5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Rotations of soybean (Glycine max) with winter grown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e5“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles were more numerous, root-knot indices and plant heights were greater, and yields were lower in plots planted to the moderately M. incognita resistant soybean cultivar, Coker 488”
The same questions in other papers
rotation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →rotation · Meloidogyne incognita · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.