Paper · 2009 · Guangxi nongye kexue

Effects of different rootstocks on growth,yield and quality of grafted muskmelon

Ezhen Zhang; Fan XueJun; Hong RiXing

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present study,three different pumpkin varieties,viz.,Zhuangshi 1,Zhuangshi 2 and Tiemuzhen and one melon rootstock,viz.Tianzhen 1 were used for grafting to thin-skin muskmelon variety Guangmi 1.The self-root seedling of Guangmi 1 was used as the control.The effects of different rootstocks on growth,yield and quality of grafted thin-skin muskmelon were studied.The results showed that survival rate and disease resistance of grafted seedlings were better than that of self-root thin-skin muskmelon seedlings.The yield of different grafted thin-skin muskmelons showed significant differences.The yield of grafted thin-skin muskmelons found to be higher than that of self-root muskmelon.Further,a significant difference in fruit taste of different grafted muskmelons has been observed.According to comprehen-sive evualution,Zhuangshi 2 combination was recommended for the best rootstock to thin-skin muskmelon,for its high disease resistance and 63.5% higher yield compared to control.The soluble solid content and taste of fruit were found to be at par with the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted muskmelon seedlings survived better than self-rooted seedlings.

Taxon
thin-skin muskmelone0
Treatment
grafted seedlingse0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
self-root thin-skin muskmelon seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that survival rate and disease resistance of grafted seedlings were better than that of self-root thin-skin muskmelon seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted muskmelon seedlings had better disease resistance than self-rooted seedlings.

Taxon
thin-skin muskmelone0
Treatment
grafted seedlingse0
Outcome
disease resistancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
self-root thin-skin muskmelon seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that survival rate and disease resistance of grafted seedlings were better than that of self-root thin-skin muskmelon seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–516 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differed significantly among muskmelon rootstocks.

Taxon
thin-skin muskmelonse0
Material
different grafted thin-skin muskmelonse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
significant differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of different grafted thin-skin muskmelons showed significant differences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted muskmelon yielded more than self-rooted muskmelon.

Taxon
thin-skin muskmelonse0
Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
self-root muskmelone0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of grafted thin-skin muskmelons found to be higher than that of self-root muskmelon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–693 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit taste differed significantly among graft combinations.

Taxon
muskmelonsCucumis meloe0
Material
different grafted muskmelonse0
Outcome
fruit tastee0
Direction
significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further,a significant difference in fruit taste of different grafted muskmelons has been observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zhuangshi 2 grafting increased muskmelon yield by 63.5% over control.

Taxon
thin-skin muskmelone0
Treatment
Zhuangshi 2 combinatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
63.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“According to comprehen-sive evualution,Zhuangshi 2 combination was recommended for the best rootstock to thin-skin muskmelon,for its high disease resistance and 63.5% higher yield compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–991 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Zhuangshi 2 combination had high disease resistance.

Taxon
thin-skin muskmelone0
Material
Zhuangshi 2e0
Outcome
disease resistancee0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

e0

“According to comprehen-sive evualution,Zhuangshi 2 combination was recommended for the best rootstock to thin-skin muskmelon,for its high disease resistance and 63.5% higher yield compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids and taste of grafted fruit were comparable to control.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftedt0
Outcome
soluble solid content and taste of fruite0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solid content and taste of fruit were found to be at par with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Zhuangshi 2 as the best muskmelon rootstock.

Taxon
thin-skin muskmelone0
Material
Zhuangshi 2e0
Outcome
recommended for the best rootstocke0

Verbatim

e0

“According to comprehen-sive evualution,Zhuangshi 2 combination was recommended for the best rootstock to thin-skin muskmelon,for its high disease resistance and 63.5% higher yield compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–991 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: general · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.