Paper · 2013

Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients and Sorbitol on Fruit Quality and Leaf Nutrient Status of Mango Cv.ALPHONSO

C. Sankar; D. Saraladevi; S. Parthiban

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Horticultural College and Research Institute, Periyakulam (Tamil Nadu) on effect of foliar application of micronutrients and sorbitol on the fruit quality and nutrient content in leaf of mango cv. Alphonso and found that the lower concentration of B, Ca and sorbitol had influenced in fruit quality compared to control. The treatment boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased the TSS, total sugars (%), reducing sugar (%), non-reducing sugar (%), ascorbic acid (mg/100g), carotenoids (mg/100g), sugar acid ratio and lowest values of acidity. In case of nutrient status in mango leaves N, P, K and B content were found to be higher in boric acid 0.02 per cent, while calcium content was maximum in calcium nitrate 0.06 per cent spray.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower B, Ca and sorbitol concentrations influenced mango fruit quality compared with control.

Treatment
lower concentration of B, Ca and sorbitole0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lower concentration of B, Ca and sorbitol had influenced in fruit quality compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased mango TSS, total sugar and reducing sugar.

Treatment
boric acid 0.02 per cente0
Outcome
TSS, total sugars (%), reducing sugar (%)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased the TSS, total sugars (%), reducing sugar (%), non-reducing sugar (%), ascorbic acid (mg/100g), carotenoids (mg/100g), sugar acid ratio and lowest values of acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased mango non-reducing sugar, ascorbic acid and carotenoids.

Treatment
boric acid 0.02 per cente0
Outcome
non-reducing sugar (%), ascorbic acid (mg/100g), carotenoids (mg/100g)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased the TSS, total sugars (%), reducing sugar (%), non-reducing sugar (%), ascorbic acid (mg/100g), carotenoids (mg/100g), sugar acid ratio and lowest values of acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased mango sugar acid ratio.

Treatment
boric acid 0.02 per cente0
Outcome
sugar acid ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased the TSS, total sugars (%), reducing sugar (%), non-reducing sugar (%), ascorbic acid (mg/100g), carotenoids (mg/100g), sugar acid ratio and lowest values of acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid 0.02 per cent gave the lowest mango fruit acidity.

Treatment
boric acid 0.02 per cente0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment boric acid 0.02 per cent significantly increased the TSS, total sugars (%), reducing sugar (%), non-reducing sugar (%), ascorbic acid (mg/100g), carotenoids (mg/100g), sugar acid ratio and lowest values of acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid 0.02 per cent produced higher mango leaf N, P and K content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
boric acid 0.02 per cente0
Outcome
N, P, Ke0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of nutrient status in mango leaves N, P, K and B content were found to be higher in boric acid 0.02 per cent, while calcium content was maximum in calcium nitrate 0.06 per cent spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid 0.02 per cent produced higher mango leaf B content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
boric acid 0.02 per cente0
Outcome
B contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of nutrient status in mango leaves N, P, K and B content were found to be higher in boric acid 0.02 per cent, while calcium content was maximum in calcium nitrate 0.06 per cent spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate 0.06 per cent spray maximized mango leaf calcium content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
calcium nitrate 0.06 per cent spraye0
Outcome
calcium contente0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of nutrient status in mango leaves N, P, K and B content were found to be higher in boric acid 0.02 per cent, while calcium content was maximum in calcium nitrate 0.06 per cent spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–771 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

boric acid · nutrient: content · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium nitrate · nutrient: content · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glucitol · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · physiology: pigments · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

boric acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.