Paper · 2014 · Horticultural Science

Alternate partial root-zone drying irrigation improves fruit quality in tomatoes

Y. SUN; P.E. HOLM; F. LIU

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Alternate partial root-zone drying (PRD) irrigation and deficit irrigation (DI) are water-saving irrigation strategies. Here, comparative effects of PRD and DI on fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) were investigated. The results showed that the irrigation treatments had no effect on tomato yield but significantly affected several organic and mineral quality attributes of the fruits. Compared to DI, PRD significantly increased the fruit concentrations of Ca and Mg, and fruit juice concentrations of total soluble solid, glucose, fructose, citric and malic acid, P, K and Mg. It is concluded that PRD is better than DI in terms of improving fruit quality, and could be a promising management strategy for simultaneous increase of water use efficiency and fruit quality in tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation treatments did not affect tomato yield.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the irrigation treatments had no effect on tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with DI, PRD increased fruit Ca and Mg concentrations significantly.

Treatment
PRDe0
Outcome
fruit concentrations of Ca and Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to DI, PRD significantly increased the fruit concentrations of Ca and Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–482 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with DI, PRD increased fruit juice concentrations of total soluble solid, glucose and fructose significantly.

Treatment
PRDe0
Outcome
fruit juice concentrations of total soluble solid, glucose, fructosee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to DI, PRD significantly increased the fruit concentrations of Ca and Mg, and fruit juice concentrations of total soluble solid, glucose, fructose, citric and malic acid, P, K and Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with DI, PRD increased fruit juice citric and malic acid concentrations significantly.

Treatment
PRDe0
Outcome
citric and malic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to DI, PRD significantly increased the fruit concentrations of Ca and Mg, and fruit juice concentrations of total soluble solid, glucose, fructose, citric and malic acid, P, K and Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with DI, PRD increased fruit juice P, K and Mg concentrations significantly.

Treatment
PRDe0
Outcome
P, K and Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to DI, PRD significantly increased the fruit concentrations of Ca and Mg, and fruit juice concentrations of total soluble solid, glucose, fructose, citric and malic acid, P, K and Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–212 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest PRD as a strategy to increase water use efficiency and tomato fruit quality together.

Outcome
simultaneous increase of water use efficiency and fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could be a promising management strategy for simultaneous increase of water use efficiency and fruit quality in tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–798 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 29 positive, 15 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 33 positive, 18 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.