Abstract
Plutella xylostella L. is a most serious of insect pest for cruciferous or Brassica crops throughout the world. The common name of this insect pest is the Diamondback Moth (DBM). Plutella xylostella L. is an oligophagous insect which is feed on the group of botanically plants within the single plant family. This insect has become major serious problem to the crops because it easily and rapidly develops their resistance to insecticides. Insecticides were used to kill Plutella xylostella L. that contribute to minimize the level of infestation. Toxicity levels were measured by lethal concentration (LC50) to estimate the effectiveness of selected insecticides. A total of three selected insecticides namely spinosad, indoxacab and abamectin had been tested against Plutella xylostella L. The data of LC50 was analyzed using PROBIT program. The result from this study had been used to estimate the effective dose or quantity of each insecticide need for controlling Plutella xylostella L. Besides that, the most effectiveness between the tested insecticides were selected for managing Plutella xylostella L. Results from this study shows that indoxacarb were most effective and toxic to control Plutella xylostella L. compared with spinosad and abamectin because it gave lower LC50 value (1010.080). In term of concentration, indoxacarb (1125 μl/5000 ml) and spinosad (2750 μl/5000 ml) was the effective concentrations for controlling Plutella xylostella L. by mortality rate more than 50%, 60% and 80% respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb was most effective against Plutella xylostella relative to spinosad and abamectin, with the lowest LC50.
- Taxon
- Cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- indoxacarbe0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostella L.e0pest
- Outcome
- LC50 valuee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 1010.080e0
- Comparator
- spinosad and abamectine0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cabbage”
e0“indoxacarb were most effective and toxic to control Plutella xylostella L. compared with spinosad and abamectin because it gave lower LC50 value (1010.080)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb at 1125 μl/5000 ml was an effective concentration for controlling Plutella xylostella.
- Taxon
- Cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- indoxacarb (1125 μl/5000 ml)e0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostella L.e0pest
- Outcome
- controlling Plutella xylostella L. by mortality ratee0
- Value
- more than 50%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cabbage”
e0“indoxacarb (1125 μl/5000 ml) and spinosad (2750 μl/5000 ml) was the effective concentrations for controlling Plutella xylostella L. by mortality rate more than 50%, 60% and 80% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad at 2750 μl/5000 ml was an effective concentration for controlling Plutella xylostella.
- Taxon
- Cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- spinosad (2750 μl/5000 ml)e0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostella L.e0pest
- Outcome
- controlling Plutella xylostella L. by mortality ratee0
- Value
- 60%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cabbage”
e0“indoxacarb (1125 μl/5000 ml) and spinosad (2750 μl/5000 ml) was the effective concentrations for controlling Plutella xylostella L. by mortality rate more than 50%, 60% and 80% respectively.”
The same questions in other papers
indoxacarb · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.