Paper · 2014 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Inactivation effect of electron beam irradiation on fungal load of naturally contaminated maize seeds

Monica R Nemţanu; Mirela Braşoveanu; Gürsel Karaca; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
43
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This work focuses on the effect of accelerated electrons (0.1-6.2 kGy) on naturally attached fungi on maize seeds. The fungal viability and corresponding inactivation kinetics were determined. The inactivation and radiosensitivity of the most abundant species in the contaminant fungi detected on maize seeds (Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp. and Fusarium spp.) are discussed. RESULTS: Fungal contamination of maize seeds decreased significantly with increasing irradiation dose. The survival curve of total fungi determined by the blotter test showed a sigmoidal pattern that can be attributed to the mixture of fungal subpopulations with different radiation sensitivities. This behaviour could be modelled well (R² = 0.995) with a modified Gompertz equation. The predicted values for shoulder length and inactivation rate were 0.63 ± 0.10 kGy and 0.44 ± 0.04 kGy⁻¹ respectively. The sensitivity of the most common fungi to electron beam treatment followed the order Penicillium spp. > Fusarium spp. > Aspergillus spp., with total inactivation at irradiation doses of 1.7, 2.5 and 4.8 kGy respectively. CONCLUSION: The effect of electron beam treatment against fungi on naturally contaminated maize seeds depended on irradiation dose, allowing the control of maize fungal load.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal contamination of maize seeds declined significantly with irradiation dose.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
irradiation dosee0
Interactor
Fungale0pathogen
Outcome
Fungal contamination of maize seedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungal contamination of maize seeds decreased significantly with increasing irradiation dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fungi survival followed a sigmoidal pattern.

Taxon
maize seedsZea mayst0
Interactor
total fungie0pathogen
Outcome
survival curve of total fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The survival curve of total fungi determined by the blotter test showed a sigmoidal pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–585 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A modified Gompertz equation fitted fungal survival well.

Taxon
maize seedsZea mayst0
Outcome
modelled welle0
Value
R² = 0.995e0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“This behaviour could be modelled well (R² = 0.995) with a modified Gompertz equation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–774 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted shoulder length was 0.63 ± 0.10 kGy.

Taxon
maize seedsZea mayst0
Outcome
shoulder lengthe0
Value
0.63 ± 0.10 kGye0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The predicted values for shoulder length and inactivation rate were 0.63 ± 0.10 kGy and 0.44 ± 0.04 kGy⁻¹ respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–894 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted inactivation rate was 0.44 ± 0.04 kGy⁻¹.

Taxon
maize seedsZea mayst0
Outcome
inactivation ratee0
Value
0.44 ± 0.04 kGy⁻¹e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The predicted values for shoulder length and inactivation rate were 0.63 ± 0.10 kGy and 0.44 ± 0.04 kGy⁻¹ respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium spp. were totally inactivated at 1.7 kGy.

Taxon
maize seedsZea mayst0
Treatment
irradiation dosese0
Interactor
Penicillium spp.Penicilliume0pathogen
Outcome
total inactivatione0
Value
1.7e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Penicillium spp. > Fusarium spp. > Aspergillus spp., with total inactivation at irradiation doses of 1.7, 2.5 and 4.8 kGy respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium spp. were totally inactivated at 2.5 kGy.

Taxon
maize seedsZea mayst0
Treatment
irradiation dosese0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
total inactivatione0
Value
2.5e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Penicillium spp. > Fusarium spp. > Aspergillus spp., with total inactivation at irradiation doses of 1.7, 2.5 and 4.8 kGy respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus spp. were totally inactivated at 4.8 kGy.

Taxon
maize seedsZea mayst0
Treatment
irradiation dosese0
Interactor
Aspergillus spp.Aspergilluse0pathogen
Outcome
total inactivatione0
Value
4.8 kGye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Penicillium spp. > Fusarium spp. > Aspergillus spp., with total inactivation at irradiation doses of 1.7, 2.5 and 4.8 kGy respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1116 · show in text ↑

radiation · Fusarium · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

radiation · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.