Paper · 2012 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Waterlogging and Hypoxia have Permanent Effects on Wheat Root Growth and Respiration

H. Araki; M. A. Hossain; T. Takahashi

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
88
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Waterlogging causes long‐lasting damage to wheat ( Triticum aestivum ). Root growth and respiration were investigated after heading in waterlogged, pot‐grown, wheat plants and also in hydroponically grown, wheat seedlings exposed to a hypoxic treatment. In the pot experiment, plants were subjected to 8 days of waterlogging after heading. This period of waterlogging resulted in reduced shoot and root growth through to maturity. The root CO 2 emission rates of previously waterlogged and well‐drained plants were about 220 and 140 nmol g −1 per s, respectively, with the rate differences persisting from 10 days after anthesis through to maturity. In the hydroponic experiments, seedlings (Feekes stage 2.0) were exposed to root‐zone, hypoxic treatment for 10–19 days. The roots showed 27 % higher CO 2 emission rates and 37 % higher O 2 consumption rates, compared with untreated roots. In whole root systems, the high respiration rates found during hypoxic treatment disappeared during recovery under aerated conditions as a result of the appearance of newly initiated roots. However, measurements of the respiration of the previously hypoxic roots showed abnormally high respiration rates. In roots exposed to hypoxic treatment, total sugar concentrations were 3.6‐times higher than in untreated roots indicating that this elevation of sugar may be responsible for the continued high respiration rate. This study shows that roots exposed to waterlogging or to hypoxic treatments do not increase their weights and thus recover from the metabolic disturbances resulting from these treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight days of waterlogging reduced wheat shoot and root growth through maturity.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
through to maturitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This period of waterlogging resulted in reduced shoot and root growth through to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously waterlogged roots had higher carbon dioxide emission than well-drained roots.

Treatment
previously waterloggede0
Outcome
root CO 2 emission ratese0
Value
220 and 140 nmol g −1 per se0
Comparator
well‐drained plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root CO 2 emission rates of previously waterlogged and well‐drained plants were about 220 and 140 nmol g −1 per s, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypoxic seedlings had 27% higher root carbon dioxide emission rates.

Treatment
hypoxic treatmente1
Outcome
CO 2 emission ratese0
Direction
highere0
Value
27 %e0
Comparator
untreated rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots showed 27 % higher CO 2 emission rates and 37 % higher O 2 consumption rates, compared with untreated roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hypoxia have Permanent Effects on Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“hypoxic treatment for 10–19 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypoxic seedlings had 37% higher root oxygen consumption rates.

Treatment
hypoxic treatmente1
Outcome
O 2 consumption ratese0
Direction
highere0
Value
37 %e0
Comparator
untreated rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots showed 27 % higher CO 2 emission rates and 37 % higher O 2 consumption rates, compared with untreated roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hypoxia have Permanent Effects on Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“hypoxic treatment for 10–19 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–778 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-root elevated respiration disappeared during aerated recovery with newly initiated roots.

Organ / stage
newly initiated rootse0
Outcome
high respiration ratese0
Qualifier
recovery under aerated conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the high respiration rates found during hypoxic treatment disappeared during recovery under aerated conditions as a result of the appearance of newly initiated roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously hypoxic roots retained abnormally high respiration rates.

Organ / stage
previously hypoxic rootse0
Outcome
respiration ratese0
Direction
abnormally highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the respiration of the previously hypoxic roots showed abnormally high respiration rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypoxic roots had 3.6 times higher total sugar concentrations than untreated roots.

Treatment
hypoxic treatmente1
Outcome
total sugar concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.6‐timese0
Comparator
untreated rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total sugar concentrations were 3.6‐times higher than in untreated roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hypoxia have Permanent Effects on Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“hypoxic treatment for 10–19 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–778 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated sugar may explain persistent high respiration.

Compound
sugare0
Outcome
continued high respiration ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this elevation of sugar may be responsible for the continued high respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposed roots failed to regain weight after waterlogging or hypoxia.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
weightse0
Direction
do not increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots exposed to waterlogging or to hypoxic treatments do not increase their weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Root Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑