Paper · 1998 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Effect of Potassium Damping-off (Pythium sp and Rhizoctonia solani) and Cold Tolerance on Tobacco Seedlings

Özlem Güngör

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of Potassium on damping off tobacco caused by Pythium sp and Rhizoctonia solani were investigated by giving 10, 20, 30 kg/da (5, 10, 15 ppm) K2SO4 as K2O base and pathogen inoculum at the same time at green house experiments. Potassium application did not present disease development at all three rates, but at the rate of 20 kg/da K2O there were a slight seedling cover of 13,75% and 3,75% for Pythium sp. and R.solani especially. Potassium at the rate of 10 kg/da prevented cold shock of tobacco seedlings at 3-5°C but at higher rates this effect was not obsenced Potassium did nat protect the at seedlings against low temperatures 1-5-(-9) °C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application prevented damping-off disease development across all three rates in tobacco seedlings.

Treatment
Potassium applicatione0
Outcome
disease developmente0
Direction
did not presente0
Qualifier
all three ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium application did not present disease development at all three rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–309 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 kg/da K2O, tobacco seedling cover was 13,75% for Pythium sp.

Treatment
20 kg/da K2Oe0
Interactor
Pythium sp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
seedling covere0
Value
13,75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the rate of 20 kg/da K2O there were a slight seedling cover of 13,75% and 3,75% for Pythium sp. and R.solani especially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 kg/da K2O, tobacco seedling cover was 3,75% for R.solani.

Treatment
20 kg/da K2Oe0
Interactor
R.solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
seedling covere0
Value
3,75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the rate of 20 kg/da K2O there were a slight seedling cover of 13,75% and 3,75% for Pythium sp. and R.solani especially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium at 10 kg/da prevented cold shock in tobacco seedlings at 3-5°C.

Treatment
Potassium at the rate of 10 kg/dae0
Outcome
cold shocke0
Direction
preventede0
Qualifier
3-5°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium at the rate of 10 kg/da prevented cold shock of tobacco seedlings at 3-5°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher potassium rates did not prevent cold shock in tobacco seedlings.

Treatment
higher ratese0
Outcome
cold shocke0
Direction
not obsencede0
Comparator
10 kg/dae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium at the rate of 10 kg/da prevented cold shock of tobacco seedlings at 3-5°C but at higher rates this effect was not obsenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium did not protect tobacco seedlings against temperatures of 1-5-(-9) °C.

Treatment
Potassiume0
Outcome
protect the at seedlings against low temperaturese0
Direction
did nat protecte0
Qualifier
1-5-(-9) °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium did nat protect the at seedlings against low temperatures 1-5-(-9) °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑

potassium · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.