Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in the Experimental Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum at Shambat in order to study the response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to phosphorus as influenced by farmyard manure (FYM). The treatments consisted of two rates of 2 5 FYM (0 and 2.5 ton ha ) and five levels of phosphorus (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg P O ha ). Triple -1 -1 2 5 superphosphate (48% P O ) was used as a source of phosphorus in the experiment. The experiment was laid out in Split-plot design with four replicates. FYM treatments were allocated to the main-plots, whereas the phosphorus levels were allotted to the sub-plots. Seeds of common bean (cultivar Shendi) were inoculated with Rhizobium phaseoli strain USDA 2669 as a basic treatment. The results showed that, application of phosphorus and FYM increased all the parameters that were examined during the experiment but the increase was not significant. Phosphorus effects were sometimes erratic and inconsistent. In addition, there was a significant effect of the interaction between phosphorus and FYM on the shoot dry weight after ten weeks from sowing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus application increased the examined parameters, without statistical significance.
- Taxon
- common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- phosphoruse0
- Interactor
- Rhizobium phaseoli strain USDA 2669Rhizobium phaseolie1symbiont
- Outcome
- all the parameters that were examinede0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of phosphorus and FYM increased all the parameters that were examined during the experiment but the increase was not significant.”
e1“Seeds of common bean (cultivar Shendi) were inoculated with Rhizobium phaseoli strain USDA 2669 as a basic treatment.”
t0“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure application increased the examined parameters, without statistical significance.
- Taxon
- common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- FYMe0
- Outcome
- all the parameters that were examinede0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of phosphorus and FYM increased all the parameters that were examined during the experiment but the increase was not significant.”
t0“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus effects were inconsistent.
- Taxon
- common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Outcome
- Phosphorus effectse0
- Qualifier
- sometimes erratic and inconsistente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phosphorus effects were sometimes erratic and inconsistent.”
t0“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus and farmyard manure interacted significantly for shoot dry weight ten weeks after sowing.
- Taxon
- common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- phosphorus and FYMe0
- Outcome
- shoot dry weighte0
- Qualifier
- after ten weeks from sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was a significant effect of the interaction between phosphorus and FYM on the shoot dry weight after ten weeks from sowing.”
t0“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · Rhizobium phaseoli · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.