Paper · 1999 · HortScience

577 Strawberry Runner Plant Root Pruning and Subsequent Growth and Yield in California

Kirk D. Larson

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Each year, 500,000,000 bare-root plants (crowns) are used to establish strawberry plantings in California. Careful placement of plants in the planting holes is a critical determinant of plant growth and productivity, but large-rooted crowns are difficult to plant correctly. Use of uniform plant material would facilitate proper planting. I conducted a study in 1997–98 to determine the influence of three root pruning treatments on performance of `Camarosa' bare-root strawberry plants. Crowns were machine-dug from a nursery on 27 Oct. 1997. Two-hundred-forty plants were selected for uniformity of size, and root systems of all selected plants were >12.7 cm in length. Root systems of individual plants were randomly subjected to three pruning treatments: nonpruned (NP), pruned to 8.9 cm in length (P1), or pruned to 4.45 cm in length (P2). Twenty plants were randomly selected from each pruning treatment, washed, divided into excised and intact root tissues, and dried at 70 °C for 6 days. Pruning resulted in the removal of 23% and 78% of root dry mass for plants in the P1 and P2 treatments, respectively. For each treatment, the 60 remaining plants were established in raised beds at the Univ. of California South Coast R.E.C. in Irvine on 1 Nov. 1997. Experimental design was a RCB, with one 20-plant plot per treatment in each of three replicate blocks. There was no plant mortality and no difference among treatments in plant canopy diameter in March (mean diam. = 36.7 cm). Fruit yields were determined for each plot at weekly intervals from 1 Feb. to 18 Apr. 1998. There was no effect of pruning on yield or fruit size, suggesting that strawberry root systems have considerable regenerative ability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning resulted in the removal of 23% and 78% of root dry mass for plants in the P1 and P2 treatments, respectively.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
P1e0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
removale0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning resulted in the removal of 23% and 78% of root dry mass for plants in the P1 and P2 treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning resulted in the removal of 23% and 78% of root dry mass for plants in the P1 and P2 treatments, respectively.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
P2e0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
removale0
Value
78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning resulted in the removal of 23% and 78% of root dry mass for plants in the P1 and P2 treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no plant mortality

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
plant mortalitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no plant mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

no difference among treatments in plant canopy diameter in March (mean diam. = 36.7 cm)

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
plant canopy diametere0
Direction
no differencee0
Value
36.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no difference among treatments in plant canopy diameter in March (mean diam. = 36.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no effect of pruning on yield

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of pruning on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no effect of pruning on yield or fruit size, suggesting that strawberry root systems have considerable regenerative ability

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of pruning on yield or fruit size, suggesting that strawberry root systems have considerable regenerative ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1712 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

strawberry root systems have considerable regenerative ability

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
considerable regenerative abilitye0
Qualifier
root systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry root systems have considerable regenerative ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1712 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

18 papers: 5 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.