Paper · 2009 · Annals of Horticulture

Effect of GA3 and Urea on Growth and Flowering in Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv. Pearl Double

Jitendra Kumar; Arjun Singh; Krishan Pal

4
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An attempt has been made to study the effect of vitalizer (GA3) and nitrogenous fertilizer (urea) on growth and floral parameters in tuberose cv. Pearl Double. The experiment was conducted at Horticultral Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, C.C.S. University Campus, Meerut, consisting two levels of GA3 (100 ppm and 200 ppm) and two levels of urea (55 and 110 g/m2). There were 9 treatment combinations, replicated three times and laid out in factorial randomized block design. The results reveal that combined application of gibberellic acid and nitrogeneous fertilizer (urea) at different doses showed the beneficial effect in different growth and flowering attributes viz., days taken for bulb sprouting, plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of floret/spike, rachis length, spike length and floret length but delay in appearance of initial spike and opening of first florets. Earliest appearance of initial spike and opening of first florets was recoreded by the individual application of gibberellic acid at higher concentration(GA3 @ 200 ppm).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined gibberellic acid and urea benefited bulb sprouting, plant height and leaf number.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
combined application of gibberellic acid and nitrogeneous fertilizer (urea)e0
Outcome
days taken for bulb sprouting, plant height, number of leaves/plante0
Direction
beneficial effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of gibberellic acid and nitrogeneous fertilizer (urea) at different doses showed the beneficial effect in different growth and flowering attributes viz., days taken for bulb sprouting, plant height, number of leaves/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined gibberellic acid and urea benefited floret number and rachis, spike and floret lengths.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
combined application of gibberellic acid and nitrogeneous fertilizer (urea)e1
Outcome
number of floret/spike, rachis length, spike length and floret lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of floret/spike, rachis length, spike length and floret length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of gibberellic acid and nitrogeneous fertilizer (urea) at different doses showed the beneficial effect in different growth and flowering attributes viz., days taken for bulb sprouting, plant height, number of leaves/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined gibberellic acid and urea delayed initial spike appearance and first floret opening.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
gibberellic acid and nitrogeneous fertilizer (urea)e1
Outcome
appearance of initial spike and opening of first floretse0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but delay in appearance of initial spike and opening of first florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of gibberellic acid and nitrogeneous fertilizer (urea) at different doses showed the beneficial effect in different growth and flowering attributes viz., days taken for bulb sprouting, plant height, number of leaves/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 200 ppm alone gave the earliest initial spike appearance and first floret opening.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
GA3 @ 200 ppme0
Outcome
appearance of initial spike and opening of first floretse0
Direction
Earlieste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earliest appearance of initial spike and opening of first florets was recoreded by the individual application of gibberellic acid at higher concentration(GA3 @ 200 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“tuberose”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.