Paper · 2011 · http://journals.usamvcluj.ro/index.php/horticulture/article/download/7041/6302/

DNA Fingerprinting Used for Testing Some Romanian Wine Varieties

Monica Hârța; Doru Pamfil; Rodica Pop; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract. The main goal of the present study was to isolate DNA both experimental and commercial wines in order to differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars (Tămâioasă Românescă, Galbenă de Odobeşti, Fetească Neagră and Busuioacă de Bohotin) by PCR using wine as a sample. Extracted residual grape DNA quality and specificity were verified using co-dominant simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers (VVS2, VVMD27, VVMD5 and VVMD7). The results obtained in this research shows that even 18 months after wine fermentation could be detected residual DNA that can be suitable for DNA fingerprinting. The 12-month-old experimental wine samples were more amplified than the 18-month-old ones. Among the microsatellite tested, VVS2 and VVMD7 gave satisfactory results. The VVS2 marker, which generated the shortest PCR amplicons (119-138 bp), amplified all of the cultivars analyzed in the wines samples. In case of commercial wines authentication of grape material by PCR using wine as a biological material was unsuccessfully due to insufficient amount of residual DNA in samples analyzed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual grape DNA could be detected in wine up to 18 months after fermentation and was suitable for DNA fingerprinting.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Outcome
residual DNAe2
Value
18 monthse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“even 18 months after wine fermentation could be detected residual DNA that can be suitable for DNA fingerprinting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–596 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental 12-month-old wine samples were more amplified than the 18-month-old ones.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
12-month-old experimental wine samplese2
Outcome
amplifiede2
Direction
moree2
Comparator
18-month-old onese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 12-month-old experimental wine samples were more amplified than the 18-month-old ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–687 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the microsatellites tested, VVS2 and VVMD7 gave satisfactory results.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Outcome
satisfactory resultse2
Comparator
the microsatellite testede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the microsatellite tested, VVS2 and VVMD7 gave satisfactory results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–762 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The VVS2 marker generated the shortest PCR amplicons, of 119-138 bp.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Outcome
shortest PCR ampliconse2
Value
119-138 bpe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“The VVS2 marker, which generated the shortest PCR amplicons (119-138 bp), amplified all of the cultivars analyzed in the wines samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–898 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The VVS2 marker amplified all of the grapevine cultivars analyzed in the wine samples.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Outcome
amplified all of the cultivarse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“The VVS2 marker, which generated the shortest PCR amplicons (119-138 bp), amplified all of the cultivars analyzed in the wines samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–898 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authentication of commercial wine grape material by PCR was unsuccessful due to insufficient residual DNA.

Taxon
grapee2
Outcome
authentication of grape material by PCRe2
Qualifier
insufficient amount of residual DNAe2

Verbatim

e1

“differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“In case of commercial wines authentication of grape material by PCR using wine as a biological material was unsuccessfully due to insufficient amount of residual DNA in samples analyzed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1085 · show in text ↑