Paper · 2003 · Biologia Plantarum

Photosynthetic and Transpiration Rates of Olea europaea subsp. sylvestris and Rhamnus lycioides as Affected by Water Deficit and Mycorrhiza

F. Caravaca; E. Díaz; J.M. Barea; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
50
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study examined the effect of mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices on physiological parameters and foliar nutrient concentrations in Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestris and Rhamnus lycioides L. seedlings subjected to well-watered or drought-stressed conditions. Under drought stress, mycorrhizal O. europaea seedlings showed significantly higher photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal conductance and foliar P concentration than its similarly-sized non-mycorrhizal counterpart. The intrinsic water use efficiency (photosynthetic rate to stomatal conductance ratio) was not change in O. europaea and decreased in R. lycioides seedlings due to mycorrhizal colonization under both well-watered and drought-stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, mycorrhizal Olea europaea seedlings had higher photosynthetic and transpiration rates and stomatal conductance than non-mycorrhizal seedlings.

Taxon
Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestrisOlea europaeae0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal conductancee1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
Under drought stresse1
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal counterparte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study examined the effect of mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices on physiological parameters and foliar nutrient concentrations in Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestris and Rhamnus lycioides L. seedlings subjected to well-watered or drought-stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought stress, mycorrhizal O. europaea seedlings showed significantly higher photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal conductance and foliar P concentration than its similarly-sized non-mycorrhizal counterpart”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, mycorrhizal Olea europaea seedlings had higher foliar P concentration than non-mycorrhizal seedlings.

Taxon
Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestrisOlea europaeae0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
foliar P concentratione1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
Under drought stresse1
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal counterparte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study examined the effect of mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices on physiological parameters and foliar nutrient concentrations in Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestris and Rhamnus lycioides L. seedlings subjected to well-watered or drought-stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought stress, mycorrhizal O. europaea seedlings showed significantly higher photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal conductance and foliar P concentration than its similarly-sized non-mycorrhizal counterpart”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization did not change the intrinsic water-use efficiency of Olea europaea under well-watered or drought conditions.

Taxon
Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestrisOlea europaeae0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonizatione2
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
intrinsic water use efficiencye2
Direction
not changee2
Qualifier
under both well-watered and drought-stress conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study examined the effect of mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices on physiological parameters and foliar nutrient concentrations in Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestris and Rhamnus lycioides L. seedlings subjected to well-watered or drought-stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–276 · show in text ↑
e2

“The intrinsic water use efficiency (photosynthetic rate to stomatal conductance ratio) was not change in O. europaea and decreased in R. lycioides seedlings due to mycorrhizal colonization under both well-watered and drought-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization decreased the intrinsic water-use efficiency of Rhamnus lycioides under well-watered and drought conditions.

Taxon
Rhamnus lycioides L.Rhamnus lycioidese0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonizatione2
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
intrinsic water use efficiencye2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
under both well-watered and drought-stress conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus lycioides
Rhamnus lycioides · Taxonאיתן פרמן · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study examined the effect of mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices on physiological parameters and foliar nutrient concentrations in Olea europaea L. subsp. sylvestris and Rhamnus lycioides L. seedlings subjected to well-watered or drought-stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–276 · show in text ↑
e2

“The intrinsic water use efficiency (photosynthetic rate to stomatal conductance ratio) was not change in O. europaea and decreased in R. lycioides seedlings due to mycorrhizal colonization under both well-watered and drought-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–746 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus intraradices · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

infection · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

infection · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.