Paper · 2013

Study the effect of different tillage methods and plant densities on yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. monech)

A. Taleshi; M.N. Moghaddam; A. R. Berimavandi; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of tillage methods and plant densities on yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. monech) in 2012. The treatments consisted of three tillage methods (no-tillage system, minimum tillage system and conventional tillage system) and three plant densities (60×20, 50×24 and 40×30 cm). Split plot design with three replications was used. The results showed that the tillage methods and plant densities had a significant effect on yields attributes measured. The highest forage yield, total dry weight, leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, seed dry weight, cab dry weight, cab-stem dry weight and husk dry weight were obtained in no-tillage system and plant density of 40×30 cm as compared with others methods of using

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage methods and plant densities significantly affected measured yield attributes.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
tillage methods and plant densitiese0
Outcome
yields attributese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the tillage methods and plant densities had a significant effect on yields attributes measured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage at 40×30 cm gave the highest forage yield, total dry weight, and leaf dry weight.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
no-tillage system and plant density of 40×30 cme0
Outcome
forage yield, total dry weight, leaf dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
others methods of usinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest forage yield, total dry weight, leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, seed dry weight, cab dry weight, cab-stem dry weight and husk dry weight were obtained in no-tillage system and plant density of 40×30 cm as compared with others methods of using”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage at 40×30 cm gave the highest stem, seed, and cab dry weights.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
no-tillage system and plant density of 40×30 cme0
Outcome
stem dry weight, seed dry weight, cab dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
others methods of usinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest forage yield, total dry weight, leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, seed dry weight, cab dry weight, cab-stem dry weight and husk dry weight were obtained in no-tillage system and plant density of 40×30 cm as compared with others methods of using”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage at 40×30 cm gave the highest cab-stem and husk dry weights.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
no-tillage system and plant density of 40×30 cme0
Outcome
cab-stem dry weight and husk dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
others methods of usinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest forage yield, total dry weight, leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, seed dry weight, cab dry weight, cab-stem dry weight and husk dry weight were obtained in no-tillage system and plant density of 40×30 cm as compared with others methods of using”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

density · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

34 papers: 22 positive, 12 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

98 papers: 83 positive, 15 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.