Paper · 2013 · Progressive Horticulture

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.)

Sakutemsu L. Jamir; VN Singh; S. P. Kanaujia; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted in 2009 at the Experimental Farm of School of Agricultural Sciences and Rural Development, Medziphema campus, Nagaland University, Nagaland to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of onion cv. Agrifound Dark Red under foothills of Nagaland. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. The treatments consisted of T1 -Control, T2– 100% NPK, T3– 75% NPK + Azospirillum, T4– 75% NPK + Phosphotica, T5– 75% NPK + Azospirillum + Phosphotica, T6- 50% NPK + 50% Pig manure, T7 - 50% NPK + 50% FYM, T8 -50% NPK + 50% Pig manure + Azospirillum, T9- 50% NPK + 50% FYM + Azospirillum, T10- 50% NPK + 50% Pig manure + Phosphotica, T11- 50% NPK + 50% FYM + Phosphotica, T12– 50% NPK + 50% Pig manure + Azospirillum + Phosphotica, T13- 50% NPK + 50% FYM + Azospirillum + Phosphotica. Results revealed that application of different levels of fertilizers, organic manures and biofertilizers either alone or in combination significantly increased the growth, yield and quality of onion as compared to control. The maximum bulb yield (18.06 t ha−1), TSS (13.18 o brix) and dry matter (15.89%) were recorded with 50% NPK + 50% FYM. The same treatment also produced the highest net return of Rs 1,29,260 ha−1 with cost-benefit ratio of 1:3.5.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly increased onion growth, yield and quality versus control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
different levels of fertilizers, organic manures and biofertilizerse0
Outcome
growth, yield and qualitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of different levels of fertilizers, organic manures and biofertilizers either alone or in combination significantly increased the growth, yield and quality of onion as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus 50% FYM produced the maximum bulb yield of 18.06 t ha−1.

Treatment
50% NPK + 50% FYMe0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
18.06 t ha−1e0
Comparator
Controle1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum bulb yield (18.06 t ha−1), TSS (13.18 o brix) and dry matter (15.89%) were recorded with 50% NPK + 50% FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“T1 -Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus 50% FYM produced TSS of 13.18 o brix.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
50% NPK + 50% FYMe0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13.18 o brixe0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum bulb yield (18.06 t ha−1), TSS (13.18 o brix) and dry matter (15.89%) were recorded with 50% NPK + 50% FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“quality of onion as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus 50% FYM produced dry matter of 15.89%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
50% NPK + 50% FYMe0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
15.89%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum bulb yield (18.06 t ha−1), TSS (13.18 o brix) and dry matter (15.89%) were recorded with 50% NPK + 50% FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“quality of onion as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave the highest net return and cost-benefit ratio.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% NPK + 50% FYMe1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs 1,29,260 ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment also produced the highest net return of Rs 1,29,260 ha−1 with cost-benefit ratio of 1:3.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1337 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded with 50% NPK + 50% FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

organic · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.