Paper · 2013 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effect of foliar nutrition of potassium nitrate on the growth and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

G.B. Vekaria; MM Talpada; G. S. Sutaria; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) season of 2000 to 2003 for successive four years to study the effect of foliar nutrition of potassium nitrate (4 levels: 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8%) along with water spray (control) on greengram var. K 851 on Vertic Ustocrepts soils at Dry Farming Research Station, Targhadia (Gujarat). Foliar application of potassium nitrate was significantly affected the relative water content (RWC) at 10 days after flowering (DAF). The higher values of RWC at maturity, pod growth rate (PGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and partitioning percentage were recorded due to foliar application of potassium nitrate as compared to water spray only. Foliar application of potassium nitrate @ 0.4% significantly increased grain yield by 18.4 per cent as compared to water spray only and also gave higher economic benefits of Rs. 2043/ha over that of water spray.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium nitrate significantly affected relative water content ten days after flowering.

Treatment
Foliar application of potassium nitratee0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e0
Qualifier
10 days after flowering (DAF)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of potassium nitrate was significantly affected the relative water content (RWC) at 10 days after flowering (DAF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium nitrate produced higher relative water content at maturity than water spray.

Treatment
foliar application of potassium nitratee0
Outcome
RWC at maturitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water spray onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher values of RWC at maturity, pod growth rate (PGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and partitioning percentage were recorded due to foliar application of potassium nitrate as compared to water spray only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium nitrate produced higher pod and crop growth rates and partitioning percentage than water spray.

Treatment
foliar application of potassium nitratee0
Outcome
pod growth rate (PGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and partitioning percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water spray onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher values of RWC at maturity, pod growth rate (PGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and partitioning percentage were recorded due to foliar application of potassium nitrate as compared to water spray only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium nitrate at 0.4% increased grain yield 18.4 per cent compared with water spray.

Treatment
Foliar application of potassium nitrate @ 0.4%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.4 per cente0
Comparator
water spray onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of potassium nitrate @ 0.4% significantly increased grain yield by 18.4 per cent as compared to water spray only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium nitrate at 0.4% gave Rs. 2043/ha higher economic benefit than water spray.

Treatment
Foliar application of potassium nitrate @ 0.4%e0
Outcome
economic benefitse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 2043/hae0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of potassium nitrate @ 0.4% significantly increased grain yield by 18.4 per cent as compared to water spray only and also gave higher economic benefits of Rs. 2043/ha over that of water spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium nitrate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

application · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.