Paper · 2008 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Safety of organic amendments and microbial pesticides to natural enemies in brinjal ecosystem

Das Pranab Jyoti; K. Basavana Goud

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The studies were carried out to assess the safety of organic amendments in combination with biorationals and microbial pesticides (spinosad 45 SC, emamectin benzoate 5 SG, avermectin 1.9 EC, Btk 5% WP and diafenthiuron 50 WP) on natural enemies associated with insects pests of brinjal. All the organic amendments and biorationals were completely safe to natural enemies (coccinellids, chrysopids & spiders). The tested microbial pesticides including one insect growth regulators did not affect the natural population throughout the crop growth period, but the synthetic insecticide was not safe to the natural enemies in brinjal ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments and biorationals were completely safe to coccinellids, chrysopids and spiders in brinjal.

Treatment
organic amendments and biorationalse0
Interactor
coccinellidse0other
Outcome
natural enemies (coccinellids, chrysopids & spiders)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the organic amendments and biorationals were completely safe to natural enemies (coccinellids, chrysopids & spiders)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–407 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested microbial pesticides did not affect the natural-enemy population throughout crop growth.

Treatment
tested microbial pesticides including one insect growth regulatorse0
Outcome
natural populatione0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
throughout the crop growth periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tested microbial pesticides including one insect growth regulators did not affect the natural population throughout the crop growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The synthetic insecticide was unsafe to natural enemies in brinjal.

Treatment
synthetic insecticidee0
Outcome
natural enemiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the synthetic insecticide was not safe to the natural enemies in brinjal ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–639 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

insecticide · ecology: diversity · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.