Paper · 2000 · Agronomy Journal

Tillage, Cover Cropping, and Poultry Litter Effects on Cotton: I. Germination and Seedling Growth

Ermson Z. Nyakatawa; K.Chandra Reddy

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Inadequate and less vigorous crop stand is a constraint to adoption of conservation tillage in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production. We evaluated the effects of tillage (conventional till, mulch‐till, no‐till), cropping system (cotton–winter fallow, cotton–winter rye, Secale cereale L.), and N source and rate (ammonium nitrate and poultry litter; 0, 100, and 200 kg N ha −1 ) on cotton seedling emergence on a Decatur silt loam soil (Typic Paleudults) in northern Alabama, from 1996 to 1998. Cotton seedling counts under no‐till were 40 to 150% greater than those under conventional till at 1 and 2 d during seedling emergence. Cotton–winter rye cropping system had 14 to 50% greater seedling counts than cotton–winter fallow cropping during the first 4 d of emergence in 1998. Poultry litter source of N gave 17 to 50% greater cotton seedling counts than ammonium nitrate during the first 4 d of emergence in 1998. In all these cases, the differences progressively narrowed down by the 4th day of seedling emergence. Cotton seedling counts were significantly correlated to cotton growth parameters and lint yield, especially in the drier year (1998). These results were attributed to soil moisture conservation during seedling emergence. Our results show that conservation tillage improved cotton germination, emergence, dry matter, and lint yield. Therefore, no‐till with winter rye cover cropping and poultry litter can be used for achieving early cotton seedling emergence and growth in the U.S. cotton belt where dryland cotton production systems are on the increase and safe disposal of poultry litter is becoming an environmental problem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till increased cotton seedling counts by 40 to 150% relative to conventional till at days 1 and 2 of emergence.

Treatment
no‐tille0
Outcome
seedling countse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
40 to 150%e0
Qualifier
at 1 and 2 d during seedling emergencee0
Comparator
conventional tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton seedling counts under no‐till were 40 to 150% greater than those under conventional till at 1 and 2 d during seedling emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton with winter rye had 14 to 50% greater seedling counts than cotton with winter fallow during the first four emergence days in 1998.

Treatment
Cotton–winter rye cropping systeme0
Outcome
seedling countse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
14 to 50%e0
Qualifier
during the first 4 d of emergence in 1998e0
Comparator
cotton–winter fallow croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton–winter rye cropping system had 14 to 50% greater seedling counts than cotton–winter fallow cropping during the first 4 d of emergence in 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry litter nitrogen increased cotton seedling counts by 17 to 50% relative to ammonium nitrate in the first four emergence days of 1998.

Treatment
Poultry litter source of Ne0
Outcome
seedling countse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
17 to 50%e0
Qualifier
during the first 4 d of emergence in 1998e0
Comparator
ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry litter source of N gave 17 to 50% greater cotton seedling counts than ammonium nitrate during the first 4 d of emergence in 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–922 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment differences in cotton seedling counts progressively narrowed by day four of emergence.

Outcome
differencese0
Direction
narrowed downe0
Qualifier
by the 4th day of seedling emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all these cases, the differences progressively narrowed down by the 4th day of seedling emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seedling counts were significantly correlated with cotton growth parameters and lint yield, especially in the drier year.

Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Outcome
cotton growth parameters and lint yielde0
Qualifier
especially in the drier year (1998)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton seedling counts were significantly correlated to cotton growth parameters and lint yield, especially in the drier year (1998)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1158 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed emergence differences to conservation of soil moisture.

Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Qualifier
soil moisture conservatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results were attributed to soil moisture conservation during seedling emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage improved cotton germination, emergence, dry matter, and lint yield.

Treatment
conservation tillagee0
Outcome
cotton germination, emergence, dry matter, and lint yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conservation tillage improved cotton germination, emergence, dry matter, and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1356 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend no-till with winter rye and poultry litter for early cotton emergence and growth in the U.S. cotton belt.

Treatment
no‐till with winter rye cover cropping and poultry littere0
Outcome
early cotton seedling emergence and growthe0
Setting
U.S. cotton belte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no‐till with winter rye cover cropping and poultry litter can be used for achieving early cotton seedling emergence and growth in the U.S. cotton belt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1519 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 18 positive, 12 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.