Paper · 2012 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Influence of phosphorus and sulphur on yield and micronutrient uptake by clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub].

B. K. Yadav; U. S. Rawat; Ram Hari Meena

20
claims
69
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted with three levels of P (0, 20 and 40 kg P2O5/ha) and three levels of S (0, 10 and 20 kg S/ha). Grain and straw yield of clusterbean increased significantly (p=0.05) with increase in level of P and S individually as well as in various combinations. Phosphorus application increased the micronutrient uptake by 22.7 to 40.3% (Fe), 18.4 to 28.2% (Cu), 22.7 to 40.3% (Zn) and 19.1 to 35.7% (Mn) in grain, however 17.2 to 30.4% (Fe), 13.1 to 19.6% (Cu), 17.1 to 31.3% (Zn) and 11.4 to 23.6% (Mn) increase in uptake was recorded in straw. Almost similar observations were recorded regarding effect of S application on micronutrient uptake in both grain and straw. Micronutrient uptake increased by 14.2 to 17.0% and 11.8 to 17.3% (Fe), 9.7 to 12.6% and 9.0 to 11.4 % (Cu), 14.5 to 16.3% and 13.8 to 16.5% (Zn) and 11.7 to 15.2 and 7.6 to 14.3% (Mn) in grain and straw, respectively. Both P and S application resulted in increased in Fe by 28.7 to 65.4% (grain) and 28.3 to 54.8% (straw). Increased in Cu uptake reported by 21.0 to 54.6% (grain) and 20.6 to 42.8% (straw) with interaction of P and S. There was 28.6 to 65.0% and 29.1 to 54.8% increased in Zn uptake in grain and straw with application of P and S. The Mn uptake was in range of 26.6 to 62.9% for grain and 24.7 to 55.8% for straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P raised clusterbean grain and straw yield.

Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
Grain and straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yield of clusterbean increased significantly (p=0.05) with increase in level of P and S individually as well as in various combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“three levels of P (0, 20 and 40 kg P2O5/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing S raised clusterbean grain and straw yield.

Treatment
Se0
Outcome
Grain and straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yield of clusterbean increased significantly (p=0.05) with increase in level of P and S individually as well as in various combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“three levels of S (0, 10 and 20 kg S/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised grain Fe uptake by 22.7 to 40.3%.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.7 to 40.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application increased the micronutrient uptake by 22.7 to 40.3% (Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“19.1 to 35.7% (Mn) in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised grain Cu uptake by 18.4 to 28.2%.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.4 to 28.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application increased the micronutrient uptake by 22.7 to 40.3% (Fe), 18.4 to 28.2% (Cu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–378 · show in text ↑
e1

“19.1 to 35.7% (Mn) in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised grain Zn uptake by 22.7 to 40.3%.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.7 to 40.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application increased the micronutrient uptake by 22.7 to 40.3% (Fe), 18.4 to 28.2% (Cu), 22.7 to 40.3% (Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“19.1 to 35.7% (Mn) in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised grain Mn uptake by 19.1 to 35.7%.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.1 to 35.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application increased the micronutrient uptake by 22.7 to 40.3% (Fe), 18.4 to 28.2% (Cu), 22.7 to 40.3% (Zn) and 19.1 to 35.7% (Mn) in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised straw Fe uptake by 17.2 to 30.4%.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.2 to 30.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17.2 to 30.4% (Fe), 13.1 to 19.6% (Cu), 17.1 to 31.3% (Zn) and 11.4 to 23.6% (Mn) increase in uptake was recorded in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised straw Cu uptake by 13.1 to 19.6%.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.1 to 19.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17.2 to 30.4% (Fe), 13.1 to 19.6% (Cu), 17.1 to 31.3% (Zn) and 11.4 to 23.6% (Mn) increase in uptake was recorded in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised straw Zn uptake by 17.1 to 31.3%.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.1 to 31.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17.2 to 30.4% (Fe), 13.1 to 19.6% (Cu), 17.1 to 31.3% (Zn) and 11.4 to 23.6% (Mn) increase in uptake was recorded in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application raised straw Mn uptake by 11.4 to 23.6%.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.4 to 23.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17.2 to 30.4% (Fe), 13.1 to 19.6% (Cu), 17.1 to 31.3% (Zn) and 11.4 to 23.6% (Mn) increase in uptake was recorded in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised grain Fe uptake by 14.2 to 17.0%.

Organ / stage
graine2
Treatment
S applicatione1
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.2 to 17.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient uptake increased by 14.2 to 17.0% and 11.8 to 17.3% (Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised straw Fe uptake by 11.8 to 17.3%.

Organ / stage
strawe2
Treatment
S applicatione1
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.8 to 17.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient uptake increased by 14.2 to 17.0% and 11.8 to 17.3% (Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised grain Cu uptake by 9.7 to 12.6%.

Organ / stage
graine3
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.7 to 12.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9.7 to 12.6% and 9.0 to 11.4 % (Cu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“Micronutrient uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–719 · show in text ↑
e2

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised straw Cu uptake by 9.0 to 11.4 %.

Organ / stage
strawe3
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.0 to 11.4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9.7 to 12.6% and 9.0 to 11.4 % (Cu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“Micronutrient uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–719 · show in text ↑
e2

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised grain Zn uptake by 14.5 to 16.3%.

Organ / stage
graine3
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.5 to 16.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“14.5 to 16.3% and 13.8 to 16.5% (Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Micronutrient uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–719 · show in text ↑
e2

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised straw Zn uptake by 13.8 to 16.5%.

Organ / stage
strawe3
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasede1
Value
13.8 to 16.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“14.5 to 16.3% and 13.8 to 16.5% (Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Micronutrient uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–719 · show in text ↑
e2

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised grain Mn uptake by 11.7 to 15.2%.

Organ / stage
graine3
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
increasede1
Value
11.7 to 15.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11.7 to 15.2 and 7.6 to 14.3% (Mn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“Micronutrient uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–719 · show in text ↑
e2

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application raised straw Mn uptake by 7.6 to 14.3%.

Organ / stage
strawe3
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.6 to 14.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11.7 to 15.2 and 7.6 to 14.3% (Mn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“Micronutrient uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–719 · show in text ↑
e2

“effect of S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“in grain and straw, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined P and S raised grain Fe uptake by 28.7 to 65.4%.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Both P and S applicatione0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.7 to 65.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both P and S application resulted in increased in Fe by 28.7 to 65.4% (grain)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined P and S raised straw Fe uptake by 28.3 to 54.8%.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Both P and S applicatione0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.3 to 54.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both P and S application resulted in increased in Fe by 28.7 to 65.4% (grain) and 28.3 to 54.8% (straw)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.