Paper · 2014 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

In vitro multiplication and rooting of ‘F12-1’ (Prunus avium L.) and ‘Maxma 14’ (Prunus mahaleb L. × P. avium L.) rootstocks

Fatih Ali Canli; Fikret Demır

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was carried out to establish efficient and reliable in vitro multiplication protocols for ‘F12-1’ (Prunus avium L.) and ‘Maxma 14’ (Prunus mahaleb L. × P. avium L.) rootstocks. Shoot tips of ‘F12-1’ and ‘Maxma 14’ were collected in the spring and cultured on MS medium. After the in vitro cultures were sufficiently established, experiments were conducted to assess the influence of different levels of benzyladenine (BA) and thidiazuron (TDZ) on multiplication of these rootstocks. After six weeks, data were collected on percent multiplication, shoot number, shoot length, percent rooting, root number and callus formation. The best multiplication rates (90 and 86.6%) for ‘F12-1’ rootstock were obtained with 20 μM BA and 2.27 μM TDZ concentrations. ‘Maxma 14’ rootstock multiplied the best (93.3%) on medium supplemented with 20 μM BA and 9.08 μM TDZ. Both rootstocks rooted the best (70 and 60%) with 9.84 μM IBA. The plantlets were transferred to glasshouse for hardening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F12-1 had a 90% best multiplication rate with 20 μM BA.

Taxon
Prunus avium L.Prunus aviumt0
Material
‘F12-1’t0
Treatment
20 μM BAe0
Outcome
multiplication ratese0
Direction
beste0
Value
90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘F12-1’ (Prunus avium L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best multiplication rates (90 and 86.6%) for ‘F12-1’ rootstock were obtained with 20 μM BA and 2.27 μM TDZ concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F12-1 had an 86.6% best multiplication rate with 2.27 μM TDZ.

Taxon
Prunus avium L.Prunus aviumt0
Material
‘F12-1’t0
Treatment
2.27 μM TDZe0
Outcome
multiplication ratese0
Direction
beste0
Value
86.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘F12-1’ (Prunus avium L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best multiplication rates (90 and 86.6%) for ‘F12-1’ rootstock were obtained with 20 μM BA and 2.27 μM TDZ concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maxma 14 multiplied best at 93.3% with 20 μM BA and 9.08 μM TDZ.

Taxon
Prunus mahaleb L. × P. avium L.Prunus mahalebt0
Material
‘Maxma 14’t0
Treatment
20 μM BA and 9.08 μM TDZe0
Outcome
multipliede0
Direction
beste0
Value
93.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus mahaleb
Prunus mahaleb · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Victor M. Vicente Selvas assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Maxma 14’ (Prunus mahaleb L. × P. avium L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Maxma 14’ rootstock multiplied the best (93.3%) on medium supplemented with 20 μM BA and 9.08 μM TDZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F12-1 rooted best at 70% with 9.84 μM IBA.

Taxon
Prunus avium L.Prunus aviumt0
Material
‘F12-1’t0
Treatment
9.84 μM IBAe0
Outcome
rootede0
Direction
beste0
Value
70e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘F12-1’ (Prunus avium L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both rootstocks rooted the best (70 and 60%) with 9.84 μM IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maxma 14 rooted best at 60% with 9.84 μM IBA.

Taxon
Prunus mahaleb L. × P. avium L.Prunus mahalebt0
Material
‘Maxma 14’t0
Treatment
9.84 μM IBAe0
Outcome
rootede0
Direction
beste0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus mahaleb
Prunus mahaleb · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Victor M. Vicente Selvas assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Maxma 14’ (Prunus mahaleb L. × P. avium L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both rootstocks rooted the best (70 and 60%) with 9.84 μM IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–925 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Prunus mahaleb (mahaleb cherry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.