Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal of Soil Conservation

Optimization of nitrogen application and irrigation for improved growth and spike production of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa Lin.)

A. C. Rathore; Jai Singh

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Optimization of nitrogen application and irrigation schedules in tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa Lin.) was tested. Maximum vegetative growth and spike production in tuberose was observed in treatment receiving nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1, which increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (tha−1) by 40% & 69%, respectively over control. However, maximum nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42% in the treatment receiving nitrogen @ 120 kg ha−1 followed by 17.7% in @ 220 kg ha−1 and 13.93% in treatment receiving N @320 kg ha−1. Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1) by 23% & 22% over control (flood irrigation) and by 30% & 44%, respectively as compared to minimum water receiving treatment at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio. Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU), irrigation water (WPIR) and total water (WPTW) includes applied water through irrigation and rainfall improved vegetative growth, spike and bulb yield appreciably with increasing ratio of water application from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE ratio but failed to increase beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio which indicates that water application beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio is not being utilized by crop. Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU) increased by 70% (0.40 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water) in 0.8 IW/CPE over control (0.23 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water). Irrigation through drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio saved water by 39% and increased dry matter in florets by 45% as compared to traditional flood method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 320 kg/ha increased florets per spike by 40% over control.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
number of florets spike−1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1, which increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (tha−1) by 40% & 69%, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–336 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 320 kg/ha increased bulb yield by 69% over control.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
bulb yield (tha−1)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
69%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1, which increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (tha−1) by 40% & 69%, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–336 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 320 kg/ha gave maximum vegetative growth and spike production.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
Maximum vegetative growth and spike productione0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum vegetative growth and spike production in tuberose was observed in treatment receiving nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency was highest at 120 kg/ha, 25.42%.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 120 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
25.42%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42% in the treatment receiving nitrogen @ 120 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency at 220 kg/ha was 17.7%.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
@ 220 kg ha−1e0e1
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0e1
Value
17.7%e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17.7% in @ 220 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency at 320 kg/ha was 13.93%.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
N @320 kg ha−1e0e1
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0e1
Value
13.93%e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.93% in treatment receiving N @320 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased florets per spike by 23% over flood irrigation.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
number of florets spike−1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
flood irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1) by 23% & 22% over control (flood irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased bulb yield by 22% over flood irrigation.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
bulb yield (t ha−1)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
flood irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1) by 23% & 22% over control (flood irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased florets per spike by 30% versus 0.4 IW/CPE.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0e1
Outcome
number of florets spike−1e0e1
Value
30%e0e1
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 30% & 44%, respectively as compared to minimum water receiving treatment at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased bulb yield by 44% versus 0.4 IW/CPE.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0e1
Outcome
bulb yield (t ha−1)e0e1
Value
44%e0e1
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 30% & 44%, respectively as compared to minimum water receiving treatment at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity and growth, spike and bulb yield improved as irrigation rose from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
water application from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
vegetative growth, spike and bulb yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU), irrigation water (WPIR) and total water (WPTW) includes applied water through irrigation and rainfall improved vegetative growth, spike and bulb yield appreciably with increasing ratio of water application from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water application beyond 0.8 IW/CPE did not increase water productivity and crop traits.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“failed to increase beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio which indicates that water application beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio is not being utilized by crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPCU increased by 70% at 0.8 IW/CPE compared with control.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
0.8 IW/CPEe0
Outcome
Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
0.40 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of watere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU) increased by 70% (0.40 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water) in 0.8 IW/CPE over control (0.23 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE saved 39% water versus flood irrigation.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
39%e0
Comparator
traditional flood methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation through drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio saved water by 39% and increased dry matter in florets by 45% as compared to traditional flood method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased floret dry matter by 45% versus flood irrigation.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
dry matter in floretse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
traditional flood methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation through drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio saved water by 39% and increased dry matter in florets by 45% as compared to traditional flood method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.