Abstract
Optimization of nitrogen application and irrigation schedules in tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa Lin.) was tested. Maximum vegetative growth and spike production in tuberose was observed in treatment receiving nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1, which increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (tha−1) by 40% & 69%, respectively over control. However, maximum nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42% in the treatment receiving nitrogen @ 120 kg ha−1 followed by 17.7% in @ 220 kg ha−1 and 13.93% in treatment receiving N @320 kg ha−1. Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1) by 23% & 22% over control (flood irrigation) and by 30% & 44%, respectively as compared to minimum water receiving treatment at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio. Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU), irrigation water (WPIR) and total water (WPTW) includes applied water through irrigation and rainfall improved vegetative growth, spike and bulb yield appreciably with increasing ratio of water application from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE ratio but failed to increase beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio which indicates that water application beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio is not being utilized by crop. Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU) increased by 70% (0.40 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water) in 0.8 IW/CPE over control (0.23 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water). Irrigation through drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio saved water by 39% and increased dry matter in florets by 45% as compared to traditional flood method.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 320 kg/ha increased florets per spike by 40% over control.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1e0
- Outcome
- number of florets spike−1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 40%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1, which increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (tha−1) by 40% & 69%, respectively over control”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 320 kg/ha increased bulb yield by 69% over control.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1e0
- Outcome
- bulb yield (tha−1)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 69%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1, which increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (tha−1) by 40% & 69%, respectively over control”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 320 kg/ha gave maximum vegetative growth and spike production.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicae0 - Treatment
- nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Maximum vegetative growth and spike productione0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maximum vegetative growth and spike production in tuberose was observed in treatment receiving nitrogen @ 320 kg ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen use efficiency was highest at 120 kg/ha, 25.42%.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- nitrogen @ 120 kg ha−1e0
- Outcome
- nitrogen use efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 25.42%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42% in the treatment receiving nitrogen @ 120 kg ha−1”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen use efficiency at 220 kg/ha was 17.7%.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“17.7% in @ 220 kg ha−1”
e1“nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42%”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen use efficiency at 320 kg/ha was 13.93%.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“13.93% in treatment receiving N @320 kg ha−1”
e1“nitrogen use efficiency was registered to be 25.42%”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased florets per spike by 23% over flood irrigation.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- number of florets spike−1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 23%e0
- Comparator
- flood irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1) by 23% & 22% over control (flood irrigation)”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased bulb yield by 22% over flood irrigation.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- bulb yield (t ha−1)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 22%e0
- Comparator
- flood irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1) by 23% & 22% over control (flood irrigation)”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased florets per spike by 30% versus 0.4 IW/CPE.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“by 30% & 44%, respectively as compared to minimum water receiving treatment at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio”
e1“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1)”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased bulb yield by 44% versus 0.4 IW/CPE.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“by 30% & 44%, respectively as compared to minimum water receiving treatment at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio”
e1“Irrigation applied at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio increased number of florets spike−1 and bulb yield (t ha−1)”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Water productivity and growth, spike and bulb yield improved as irrigation rose from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- water application from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, spike and bulb yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU), irrigation water (WPIR) and total water (WPTW) includes applied water through irrigation and rainfall improved vegetative growth, spike and bulb yield appreciably with increasing ratio of water application from 0.4 to 0.8 IW/CPE ratio”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Water application beyond 0.8 IW/CPE did not increase water productivity and crop traits.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- increasee0
- Direction
- failed to increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“failed to increase beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio which indicates that water application beyond 0.8 IW/CPE ratio is not being utilized by crop”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
WPCU increased by 70% at 0.8 IW/CPE compared with control.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- 0.8 IW/CPEe0
- Outcome
- Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 70%e0
- Qualifier
- 0.40 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of watere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Water productivity based on consumptive use (WPCU) increased by 70% (0.40 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water) in 0.8 IW/CPE over control (0.23 g. dry matter in florets kg−1 of water)”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE saved 39% water versus flood irrigation.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- watere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 39%e0
- Comparator
- traditional flood methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation through drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio saved water by 39% and increased dry matter in florets by 45% as compared to traditional flood method”
t0“tuberose”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased floret dry matter by 45% versus flood irrigation.
- Taxon
- tuberose
Agave amicat0 - Treatment
- drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- dry matter in floretse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 45%e0
- Comparator
- traditional flood methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation through drip system at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio saved water by 39% and increased dry matter in florets by 45% as compared to traditional flood method”
t0“tuberose”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.