Paper · 2011 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Integrated Management of Damping-off, Root and/or Stem Rot Diseases of Chickpea and Efficacy of the Suggested Formula

Montaser Fawzy ABDEL-MONAIM

20
claims
44
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots collected from different locations in New Valley Governorate (Egypt). The isolated fungi were purified and identified as Rhizoctonia solani (5 isolates), Fusarium solani (4 isolates) and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (2 isolates). The isolated fungi proved their pathogenicity on cv. ‘Giza 3’. Response of chickpea cvs. ‘Giza 1’, ‘Giza 2’, ‘Giza 3’, ‘Giza 4’, ‘Giza 88’, ‘Giza 195’, ‘Giza 531’ to infection by the tested fungi was significantly varied. ‘Giza 1’ was the most resistant one followed by ‘Giza 531’, while the other tested cvs. were highly susceptible. Seven biocontrol agents, namely Bacillus subtilis, B. megaterium, B. cereus, Trichoderma viride, T. harzianum, Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp. isolated from chickpea rhizosphere, were tested for their antagonistic action against the tested pathogens. B. subtilis isolate BSM1, B. megaterium isolate TVM5, T. viride isolate TVM2 and T. harzianum isolate THM4 were the most antagonistic ones to the tested fungi in vitro, while the other isolates were moderate or weak antagonists. The most antagonistic isolates as well as the commercial biocide Rhizo-N were applied as seed treatment for controlling damping-off, root and/or stem rot diseases caused by the tested fungi under greenhouse conditions. The obtained data showed that all tested antagonistic isolates were able to cause significant reduction of damping-off, root and/or stem rot diseases in chickpea plants. T. viride (isolate TVM2) and B. megaterium (isolate BMM5) proved to be the most effective isolates for controlling the diseases. Under field condition, the obtained data indicated that all the tested antagonistic isolates significantly reduced damping-off, root and/or stem rot. T. viride (isolate TVM2) and B. megaterium (isolate BMM5) recorded the highest reduction of damping-off, root and/or stem rot in all sowing dates. Sowing of treated seeds with bioagents in first of November gave the highest protection against root diseases in chickpea. The reduction in damping-off, root and/or stem rot severity was significantly reflected on the produced seed yield. In this respect, seeds previously treated with T. viride (TVM2) produced the highest seed yield in all sowing dates followed by seed treated with B. megaterium (TVM5). First of November was the best sowing date to reduce these diseases and to increase seed yield/fed. On the other hand, the antagonistic isolates isolated from chickpea rhizosphere, were most active than the commercial biocide Rhizo-N in reducing chickpea root diseases and increase of seed yield in greenhouse and field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven fungal isolates from chickpea roots were identified as Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie1pathogen
Outcome
isolated fungie1
Qualifier
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (2 isolates)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · Second interactorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The isolated fungi were purified and identified as Rhizoctonia solani (5 isolates), Fusarium solani (4 isolates) and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (2 isolates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–300 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolated fungi proved pathogenic on chickpea cultivar Giza 3.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Giza 3e1
Interactor
isolated fungie1pathogen
Outcome
pathogenicitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The isolated fungi proved their pathogenicity on cv. ‘Giza 3’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivar Giza 1 was the most resistant to infection by the tested fungi.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Giza 1e2
Interactor
tested fungie1pathogen
Outcome
Responsee1
Direction
most resistante2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Response of chickpea cvs. ‘Giza 1’, ‘Giza 2’, ‘Giza 3’, ‘Giza 4’, ‘Giza 88’, ‘Giza 195’, ‘Giza 531’ to infection by the tested fungi was significantly varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–522 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Giza 1’ was the most resistant one followed by ‘Giza 531’, while the other tested cvs. were highly susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–635 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivar Giza 531 ranked after Giza 1 in resistance to the tested fungi.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Giza 531e2
Interactor
tested fungie1pathogen
Outcome
Responsee1
Direction
followed bye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Response of chickpea cvs. ‘Giza 1’, ‘Giza 2’, ‘Giza 3’, ‘Giza 4’, ‘Giza 88’, ‘Giza 195’, ‘Giza 531’ to infection by the tested fungi was significantly varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–522 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Giza 1’ was the most resistant one followed by ‘Giza 531’, while the other tested cvs. were highly susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–635 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other tested chickpea cultivars were highly susceptible to infection by the tested fungi.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
other tested cvs.e2
Interactor
tested fungie1pathogen
Outcome
Responsee1
Direction
highly susceptiblee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Response of chickpea cvs. ‘Giza 1’, ‘Giza 2’, ‘Giza 3’, ‘Giza 4’, ‘Giza 88’, ‘Giza 195’, ‘Giza 531’ to infection by the tested fungi was significantly varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–522 · show in text ↑
e2

“‘Giza 1’ was the most resistant one followed by ‘Giza 531’, while the other tested cvs. were highly susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–635 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The response of chickpea cultivars to infection by the tested fungi was significantly varied.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Interactor
tested fungie1pathogen
Outcome
Responsee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Response of chickpea cvs. ‘Giza 1’, ‘Giza 2’, ‘Giza 3’, ‘Giza 4’, ‘Giza 88’, ‘Giza 195’, ‘Giza 531’ to infection by the tested fungi was significantly varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis BSM1, B. megaterium TVM5 and Trichoderma viride TVM2 were the most antagonistic isolates to the tested fungi in vitro.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
B. subtilis isolate BSM1, B. megaterium isolate TVM5, T. viride isolate TVM2e1
Interactor
tested fungie1pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilis isolate BSM1, B. megaterium isolate TVM5, T. viride isolate TVM2Priestia megateriumBacillus subtilisTrichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic onese1
Direction
most antagonistice1
Comparator
other isolatese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · Second interactorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. subtilis isolate BSM1, B. megaterium isolate TVM5, T. viride isolate TVM2 and T. harzianum isolate THM4 were the most antagonistic ones to the tested fungi in vitro, while the other isolates were moderate or weak antagonists”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum THM4 was the most antagonistic isolate to the tested fungi in vitro.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T. harzianum isolate THM4e1
Interactor
tested fungie1pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum isolate THM4Trichoderma harzianume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic onese1
Direction
most antagonistice1
Comparator
other isolatese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. subtilis isolate BSM1, B. megaterium isolate TVM5, T. viride isolate TVM2 and T. harzianum isolate THM4 were the most antagonistic ones to the tested fungi in vitro, while the other isolates were moderate or weak antagonists”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other isolates were moderate or weak antagonists in vitro.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
antagonistse1
Direction
moderate or weake1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. subtilis isolate BSM1, B. megaterium isolate TVM5, T. viride isolate TVM2 and T. harzianum isolate THM4 were the most antagonistic ones to the tested fungi in vitro, while the other isolates were moderate or weak antagonists”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with the antagonistic isolates significantly reduced damping-off, root and stem rot diseases in chickpea under greenhouse conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
tested antagonistic isolatese2
Interactor
tested fungie1pathogen
Outcome
damping-off, root and/or stem rot diseasese2
Direction
reductione2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most antagonistic isolates as well as the commercial biocide Rhizo-N were applied as seed treatment for controlling damping-off, root and/or stem rot diseases caused by the tested fungi under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1335 · show in text ↑
e2

“The obtained data showed that all tested antagonistic isolates were able to cause significant reduction of damping-off, root and/or stem rot diseases in chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride (TVM2) and B. megaterium (BMM5) proved the most effective isolates for controlling the diseases of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T. viride (isolate TVM2) and B. megaterium (isolate BMM5)e1
Interactor
T. viride (isolate TVM2)Trichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. megaterium (isolate BMM5)Priestia megateriume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
the diseasese1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · Second interactorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“T. viride (isolate TVM2) and B. megaterium (isolate BMM5) proved to be the most effective isolates for controlling the diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under field conditions, all tested antagonistic isolates significantly reduced damping-off, root and stem rot in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
tested antagonistic isolatese1
Outcome
damping-off, root and/or stem rote1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
field conditione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under field condition, the obtained data indicated that all the tested antagonistic isolates significantly reduced damping-off, root and/or stem rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride (TVM2) and B. megaterium (BMM5) gave the highest reduction of damping-off, root and stem rot in all sowing dates under field conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T. viride (isolate TVM2) and B. megaterium (isolate BMM5)e1
Interactor
T. viride (isolate TVM2)Trichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. megaterium (isolate BMM5)Priestia megateriume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
damping-off, root and/or stem rote1
Direction
highest reductione1
Qualifier
in all sowing datese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · Second interactorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“T. viride (isolate TVM2) and B. megaterium (isolate BMM5) recorded the highest reduction of damping-off, root and/or stem rot in all sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing treated seeds in the first of November gave the highest protection against root diseases in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Sowing of treated seeds with bioagents in first of Novembere1
Outcome
protection against root diseasese1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sowing of treated seeds with bioagents in first of November gave the highest protection against root diseases in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1933–2054 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in damping-off, root and stem rot severity was significantly reflected in increased chickpea seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
reduction in damping-off, root and/or stem rot severitye1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reduction in damping-off, root and/or stem rot severity was significantly reflected on the produced seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2056–2170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treated with T. viride (TVM2) gave the highest chickpea seed yield in all sowing dates.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T. viride (TVM2)e1
Interactor
T. viride (TVM2)Trichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
in all sowing datese1
Comparator
seed treated with B. megaterium (TVM5)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeds previously treated with T. viride (TVM2) produced the highest seed yield in all sowing dates followed by seed treated with B. megaterium (TVM5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2189–2338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treated with B. megaterium (TVM5) gave the next highest chickpea seed yield, after T. viride (TVM2).

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
seed treated with B. megaterium (TVM5)e1
Interactor
B. megaterium (TVM5)Priestia megateriume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
followed bye1
Qualifier
in all sowing datese1
Comparator
seeds previously treated with T. viride (TVM2)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeds previously treated with T. viride (TVM2) produced the highest seed yield in all sowing dates followed by seed treated with B. megaterium (TVM5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2189–2338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First of November was the best sowing date for chickpea seed yield per feddan.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
First of Novembere1
Outcome
seed yield/fede1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“First of November was the best sowing date to reduce these diseases and to increase seed yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2340–2438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonistic isolates from chickpea rhizosphere were more active than the commercial biocide Rhizo-N in reducing chickpea root diseases in greenhouse and field conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
the antagonistic isolates isolated from chickpea rhizospheree1
Outcome
reducing chickpea root diseasese1
Direction
most activee1
Comparator
the commercial biocide Rhizo-Ne1
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“the antagonistic isolates isolated from chickpea rhizosphere, were most active than the commercial biocide Rhizo-N in reducing chickpea root diseases and increase of seed yield in greenhouse and field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2459–2670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonistic isolates from chickpea rhizosphere increased chickpea seed yield more than the commercial biocide Rhizo-N in greenhouse and field conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
the antagonistic isolates isolated from chickpea rhizospheree1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
the commercial biocide Rhizo-Ne1
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven fungal isolates were isolated from naturally infected chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“the antagonistic isolates isolated from chickpea rhizosphere, were most active than the commercial biocide Rhizo-N in reducing chickpea root diseases and increase of seed yield in greenhouse and field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2459–2670 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Priestia megaterium · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Priestia megaterium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

biocontrol · control · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.