Paper · 1989

Does Rubus canadensis Interfere with the Growth of Fraser Fir Seedlings

Eric F. Pauley

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Vegetation change in the Great Smoky Mountains fol lowing balsam woolly ade lgid-caused mortality of Fraser fir has inc luded deve lopment of a dense Rubus canadens is s hrub layer . Many fir seedlings have persisted in the forest understory , but the possible effects of Rubus on their annual growth have not been intens ive ly studied . This study had two objectives : ( 1 ) to determine i f s igni ficant associations exist among density and shoot growth of Fraser f i r seedlings , density/biomass of Rubus canadens is , canopy closure , and soi l chemical parameters , and ( 2 ) to determine the effects of removal of aboveground Rubus stems on fir seedling shoot growth . Eighty 1 x 1 m plots were used on Mount Col lins , Great Smoky Mountains National Park , to characterize the unders tory habitat of Fraser fir seedlings . Terminal and lateral shoot lengths of the 1 9 8 3 1 9 8 7 growth were measured on fir seedlings . Seedlings were class i fied according to substrate type , surface type , substrate form , presence of ade lgid damage , and age . Soil samples were taken for analyses of pH , potassium , phosphorus , and calcium . Overstory composition was characteri zed with prism plots . Fourteen 2 x 2 m plots were es tablished to determine e f fects of Rubus removal on fir seedling growth , herbaceous cover , shrub/seedling counts , and soil parameters . i i i Rubus canadens is dens ity was highest on the southwes t ­ f acing s lope and lowest o n the northeastfacing s lope of Mount Collins . Fraser fir seedling density was highest on the northeastfac ing s lope and lowest on the southwest­ f acing s lope . The Spearman rank corre lation between Rubus dens ity and f i r seedling density was 0 . 3 7 6 ( P < 0.0 1 ) ; a graph of these data showed variabi lity in fir dens ity to decrease with increas ing Rubus density . Most years of fir termina l shoot growth showed positive as sociations with Rubus density ( 0 . 3 0 9 0 . 3 9 6 , P < 0 . 0 1 ) ; a graph of these data showed no pronounced relationship . Rubus dens ity and biomass were s igni ficantly correlated with soil phosphorus and potassium concentrations . All years of termina l shoot growth of f i r seedlings measured showed positive as soc iations with soil pH and potass ium concentration . Most f i r seedlings were �2 5 em tall . Only 3 8 % were <5 years old . More seedlings than expected occupied dead wood substrates , and more than expected were found on bryophyte­ covered surface s . More than 25% of seedlings showed ade lgid damage ; ade lgid damage was more prevalent among seedlings �5 years old . Most seedlings showed a trend of increasing gains of terminal shoot growth over previous ye ars of growth . Remova l of Rubus s tems produced no signif icant effect on fir seedling shoot growth over one season . No Rubus ­ removal effects were found on any other understory var iable iv measured ; Rubus itself responded to removal by rapid appearance and growth of new stems . Large seasonal changes in bryophyte cover and red spruce seedling dens ity ( from germination ) occurred , but the se changes were not affected by Rubus removal . Germinal Fraser f i r seedlings are scarce and are not like ly to appear in large numbers unle ss existing understory firs reach reproductive age . inhibit establishment of fir seedlings . Rubus appears to Fir shoot growth doe s not appear to be assoc iated with Rubus dens ity or biomass . Fir shoot growth trends are probably consequences o f normal growth patterns and recovery from adelgid infestation .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubus canadensis density was highest on the southwest-facing slope.

Taxon
Rubus canadens ise0
Outcome
Rubus canadens is dens itye0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Rubus canadens is dens ity was highest on the southwes t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fraser fir seedling density was highest on the northeast-facing slope.

Taxon
Fraser fire0
Outcome
seedling densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
northeastfac ing s lopee0

Verbatim

e0

“Fraser fir seedling density was highest on the northeastfac ing s lope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1587 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubus density and Fraser fir seedling density were positively rank-correlated (Spearman 0.376, P < 0.01).

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Interactor
RubusRubuse0other
Outcome
f i r seedling densitye0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0 . 3 7 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Spearman rank corre lation between Rubus dens ity and f i r seedling density was 0 . 3 7 6 ( P < 0.0 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In most years terminal shoot growth of fir seedlings was positively associated with Rubus density (coefficients 0.309 to 0.396, P < 0.01).

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Interactor
RubusRubuse0other
Outcome
fir termina l shoot growthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0 . 3 0 9 0 . 3 9 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most years of fir termina l shoot growth showed positive as sociations with Rubus density ( 0 . 3 0 9 0 . 3 9 6 , P < 0 . 0 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubus density and biomass were significantly correlated with soil phosphorus and potassium concentrations.

Taxon
RubusRubuse0
Compound
phosphorus and potassiume0
Outcome
Rubus dens ity and biomasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rubus dens ity and biomass were s igni ficantly correlated with soil phosphorus and potassium concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2144 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In all measured years, terminal shoot growth of fir seedlings was positively associated with soil pH and potassium concentration.

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Compound
potass iume0
Outcome
termina l shoot growth of f i r seedlingse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Qualifier
soil pHe0

Verbatim

e0

“All years of termina l shoot growth of f i r seedlings measured showed positive as soc iations with soil pH and potass ium concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2147–2283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 38% of the fir seedlings were younger than 5 years.

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Outcome
<5 years olde0
Value
3 8 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“Only 3 8 % were <5 years old”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2327–2355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More fir seedlings than expected occupied dead wood substrates.

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Outcome
occupied dead wood substratese0
Direction
higherinferrede0

Verbatim

e0

“More seedlings than expected occupied dead wood substrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2358–2416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than 25% of seedlings showed adelgid damage.

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Outcome
ade lgid damagee0
Direction
More thane0
Value
25%e0

Verbatim

e0

“More than 25% of seedlings showed ade lgid damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2487–2536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most seedlings showed a trend of increasing gains in terminal shoot growth over previous years.

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Outcome
terminal shoot growthe0
Direction
increasinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Most seedlings showed a trend of increasing gains of terminal shoot growth over previous ye ars of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2605–2710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of Rubus stems had no significant effect on fir seedling shoot growth over one season.

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Treatment
Remova l of Rubus s temse0
Interactor
RubusRubuse0other
Outcome
fir seedling shoot growthe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Remova l of Rubus s tems produced no signif icant effect on fir seedling shoot growth over one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2713–2814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubus responded to stem removal by rapid appearance and growth of new stems.

Taxon
RubusRubuse0
Outcome
rapid appearance and growth of new stemse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rubus itself responded to removal by rapid appearance and growth of new stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2903–2980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large seasonal changes in bryophyte cover and red spruce seedling density occurred and were not affected by Rubus removal.

Taxon
red sprucePicea rubense0
Treatment
Rubus removale0
Outcome
seasonal changes in bryophyte cover and red spruce seedling dens itye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea rubens
Picea rubens · TaxonForest Wander from Cross Lanes, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large seasonal changes in bryophyte cover and red spruce seedling dens ity ( from germination ) occurred , but the se changes were not affected by Rubus removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2983–3143 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fir shoot growth does not appear to be associated with Rubus density or biomass.

Taxon
Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
Interactor
RubusRubuse0other
Outcome
Fir shoot growthe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fir shoot growth doe s not appear to be assoc iated with Rubus dens ity or biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3352–3434 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑