Abstract
This article presents quality evaluation of flour and bread from winter wheat grain cv. Bogatka, obtained from the field experiment conducted in the years 2006-2009. Experimental factors included: plant protection (extensive, intensive), nitrogen fertilization (60, 100, 140, 180 kg·ha -1 ), harvest time (optimum and delayed for 2 weeks) as well as the grain storage time. Directly after the harvest and after a half-year storage, quality evaluation of flour and bread baked from it was conducted. Determination included: sedimentation index, falling number and water absorption of flour, as well as volume and density of bread crumb. Organoleptic evaluation of its quality was also conducted. Intensive plant protection, nitrogen fertilization of 140 and 180 kg N·ha -1 , grain harvest at optimum time and its short storage guaranteed obtaining flour of good quality parameters. Bread baked from it was characterized by good volume, porosity and texture of crumb, crust colour, good smell and taste. Bread baked from flour from wheat grain which was fertilized with 60 kg N·ha -1 , after extensive agrophage control and delayed harvest time, was characterized by a large number of irregular pores, dense crumb, lower elasticity, as well as by a crust which was cracked, too dark and coming off the crumb.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive plant protection with 140 or 180 kg N/ha, optimum harvest time and short storage gave flour of good quality parameters.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Bogatkae1
- Treatment
- Intensive plant protection, nitrogen fertilization of 140 and 180 kg N·ha -1e3
- Outcome
- flour of good quality parameterse3
- Setting
- field experimente1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT”
e1“winter wheat grain cv. Bogatka, obtained from the field experiment conducted in the years 2006-2009”
e3“Intensive plant protection, nitrogen fertilization of 140 and 180 kg N·ha -1 , grain harvest at optimum time and its short storage guaranteed obtaining flour of good quality parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Bread from intensively protected wheat with 140 or 180 kg N/ha had good volume, porosity and crumb texture.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Intensive plant protection, nitrogen fertilization of 140 and 180 kg N·ha -1e3
- Outcome
- volume, porosity and texture of crumbe4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT”
e3“Intensive plant protection, nitrogen fertilization of 140 and 180 kg N·ha -1 , grain harvest at optimum time and its short storage guaranteed obtaining flour of good quality parameters”
e4“Bread baked from it was characterized by good volume, porosity and texture of crumb, crust colour, good smell and taste”
Claim · model-written summary
Bread from wheat fertilized with 60 kg N/ha after extensive protection and delayed harvest had many irregular pores, dense crumb and lower elasticity.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fertilized with 60 kg N·ha -1e5
- Outcome
- a large number of irregular pores, dense crumb, lower elasticitye5
- Qualifier
- after extensive agrophage control and delayed harvest timee5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT”
e5“Bread baked from flour from wheat grain which was fertilized with 60 kg N·ha -1 , after extensive agrophage control and delayed harvest time, was characterized by a large number of irregular pores, dense crumb, lower elasticity, as well as by a crust which was cracked, too dark and coming off the crumb”
Claim · model-written summary
Bread from wheat fertilized with 60 kg N/ha after extensive protection and delayed harvest had a cracked, too dark crust that came off the crumb.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fertilized with 60 kg N·ha -1e5
- Outcome
- a crust which was cracked, too dark and coming off the crumbe5
- Qualifier
- after extensive agrophage control and delayed harvest timee5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT”
e5“Bread baked from flour from wheat grain which was fertilized with 60 kg N·ha -1 , after extensive agrophage control and delayed harvest time, was characterized by a large number of irregular pores, dense crumb, lower elasticity, as well as by a crust which was cracked, too dark and coming off the crumb”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
169 papers more in this group
See all 173 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.