Paper · 2012 · Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Influence of Increased Salinity on Physiological Responses of Hydroponic Grown Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Aktham Abu-Khadejeh; Rida A. Shibli; Ibrahim M. Makhadmeh; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Hydroponic cultures were used to evaluate salt stress responses in two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes. Hydroponic cultures were grown on media supplemented with 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM NaCl and CaCl2 in equal molar ratio, growth and physiological traits were determined. Negative response had happened in growth parameters (FW (fresh weight), DW (Dry weight) and shoot height). Na+, Cl¯ and Ca+² ions and proline concentrations increased in both cultivars of hydroponically grown plants with increase in salinity. In contrast, K+ ions decreased with increase in salinity. Induced salinity significantly reduced (more negative) cell sap osmotic potential. The genotype JO992 generally had higher shoot and root fresh weight, dry weight, shoot height and root length than JO112. The results indicate that, in both genotypes, osmotic adjustment was achieved by means of Na+, Cl¯ and Ca+² ions uptake from the medium and by synthesis of proline.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity negatively affected the fresh weight, dry weight and shoot height of tomato genotypes.

Material
JO112 and JO992e1
Treatment
NaCl and CaCl2e0
Outcome
growth parameterse2
Direction
Negative responsee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e2

“Negative response had happened in growth parameters (FW (fresh weight), DW (Dry weight) and shoot height)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–415 · show in text ↑
e0

“0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM NaCl and CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased Na+, Cl- and Ca2+ ion concentrations in tomato plants.

Material
JO112 and JO992e1
Treatment
NaCl and CaCl2e0
Outcome
Na+, Cl¯ and Ca+² ionse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e3

“Na+, Cl¯ and Ca+² ions and proline concentrations increased in both cultivars of hydroponically grown plants with increase in salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–551 · show in text ↑
e0

“0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM NaCl and CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased proline concentrations in tomato plants.

Material
JO112 and JO992e1
Treatment
NaCl and CaCl2e0
Outcome
proline concentrationse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e3

“Na+, Cl¯ and Ca+² ions and proline concentrations increased in both cultivars of hydroponically grown plants with increase in salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–551 · show in text ↑
e0

“0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM NaCl and CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased K+ ion concentrations in tomato plants.

Material
JO112 and JO992e1
Treatment
NaCl and CaCl2e0
Outcome
K+ ionse4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e4

“In contrast, K+ ions decreased with increase in salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–609 · show in text ↑
e0

“0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM NaCl and CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Induced salinity significantly reduced the cell sap osmotic potential of tomato plants.

Material
JO112 and JO992e1
Treatment
NaCl and CaCl2e0
Outcome
cell sap osmotic potentiale5
Direction
reducede5
Qualifier
more negativee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e5

“Induced salinity significantly reduced (more negative) cell sap osmotic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–692 · show in text ↑
e0

“0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM NaCl and CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype JO992 had higher shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight than JO112.

Material
JO992e6
Outcome
shoot and root fresh weight, dry weighte6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
JO112e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e6

“The genotype JO992 generally had higher shoot and root fresh weight, dry weight, shoot height and root length than JO112”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype JO992 had higher shoot height and root length than JO112.

Material
JO992e6
Outcome
shoot height and root lengthe6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
JO112e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e6

“The genotype JO992 generally had higher shoot and root fresh weight, dry weight, shoot height and root length than JO112”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–814 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato osmotic adjustment under salinity was achieved by uptake of Na+, Cl- and Ca2+ ions and by proline synthesis.

Compound
prolinee7
Outcome
osmotic adjustmente7
Qualifier
Na+, Cl¯ and Ca+² ions uptake from the mediume7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two (JO112 and JO992) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–137 · show in text ↑
e7

“osmotic adjustment was achieved by means of Na+, Cl¯ and Ca+² ions uptake from the medium and by synthesis of proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–979 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.