Paper · 2008 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

Breeding for nitrogen use efficiency in organic wheat systems.

J. C. Dawson; Kevin Murphy; Stephen S. Jones

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improving crop nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is important to reducing the environmental impacts of agriculture, for both perennial and annual crops. This study tested winter wheat breeding lines developed in organic and conventional systems, historic wheat varieties and perennial wheat under organic management. There were significant differences among selection categories and among genotypes. However, standard methods of measuring NUE may not be appropriate when the breeding objectives are to reduce N use. Alternative methods of evaluating breeding materials, including regression analysis of grain protein deviation (GPD) and principal component analysis (PCA) were explored. GPD was not found to discriminate well between genotypes in this study, but PCA showed promise in examining the relationship among measured variables and among genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection categories and genotypes differed significantly.

Outcome
differences among selection categories and among genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were significant differences among selection categories and among genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–394 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein deviation did not discriminate well between genotypes.

Outcome
discriminate well between genotypese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“GPD was not found to discriminate well between genotypes in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–753 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA showed promise for examining relationships among measured variables and genotypes.

Outcome
examining the relationship among measured variables and among genotypese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“PCA showed promise in examining the relationship among measured variables and among genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–852 · show in text ↑