Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Sub-optimum low temperature storage of ‘Nagpur’ mandarin as influenced by wax coating and intermittent warming

Ladaniya; Shyam Singh; Bipinchandra Mahalle

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of wax coating (Sta-fresh 921) and intermittent warming at sub-optimum low temperature (3–4°C) were evaluated during long term storage (75 days) of ‘Nagpur’ mandarin fruits packed in vented polyethylene lined CFB boxes. Fruits were also evaluated after one week of shelf-life at 20 ± 2°C and 70 ± 5% RH at each cool storage interval. There was no chilling injury in fruits stored with intermittent warming (3–4°C) 2 wk + (20°C) 1 wk cycle} in either waxed or non-waxed fruits upto 75 days. At 3–4°C (continuous) waxed and non-waxed fruits recorded higher chilling injury. However, wax coated fruits had less chilling injury as compared with non-coated fruits. Decay was higher in fruits stored at 3–4°C followed by fruits stored at 6–7°C (continuous). There was no significant difference in physiological weight loss between waxed and non-waxed fruit. Intermittent warming treatment resulted in very good colour development. Fruit firmness was higher in wax coated fruit than non-coated fruit under all storage conditions. Appearance and flavour score were maximum in fruits stored with intermittent warming. Acceptability was maximum in wax coated fruits stored at 3–4°C (2 wk) + 20°C (1 wk) cycle. Findings indicated that intermittent warming and wax coating are useful for extending the storage life of ‘Nagpur’ mandarin up to 75 days with 1-wk shelf life at ambient conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No chilling injury occurred in mandarin fruit stored with intermittent warming, waxed or non-waxed, up to 75 days.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
intermittent warming (3–4°C) 2 wk + (20°C) 1 wke1
Outcome
chilling injurye1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no chilling injury in fruits stored with intermittent warming (3–4°C) 2 wk + (20°C) 1 wk cycle} in either waxed or non-waxed fruits upto 75 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–496 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous storage at 3–4°C increased chilling injury in both waxed and non-waxed mandarin fruit.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
3–4°C (continuous)e2
Outcome
chilling injurye2
Direction
highere2

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 3–4°C (continuous) waxed and non-waxed fruits recorded higher chilling injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax coated mandarin fruit had less chilling injury than non-coated fruit.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
wax coatede3
Outcome
chilling injurye3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
non-coated fruitse3

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“wax coated fruits had less chilling injury as compared with non-coated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decay was higher in mandarin stored continuously at 3–4°C than at 6–7°C.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
stored at 3–4°Ce4
Outcome
Decaye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
6–7°C (continuous)e4

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e4

“Decay was higher in fruits stored at 3–4°C followed by fruits stored at 6–7°C (continuous)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological weight loss did not differ significantly between waxed and non-waxed mandarin fruit.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
waxede5
Outcome
physiological weight losse5
Direction
no significant differencee5
Comparator
non-waxed fruite5

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no significant difference in physiological weight loss between waxed and non-waxed fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness was higher in wax coated than in non-coated mandarin fruit under all storage conditions.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
wax coatede6
Outcome
Fruit firmnesse6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
non-coated fruite6

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruit firmness was higher in wax coated fruit than non-coated fruit under all storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1029 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent warming resulted in very good colour development in mandarin fruit.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
Intermittent warming treatmente7
Outcome
colour developmente7
Direction
very goode7

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e7

“Intermittent warming treatment resulted in very good colour development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–931 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appearance and flavour scores were highest in fruit stored with intermittent warming.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
intermittent warminge0
Outcome
Appearance and flavour scoree0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Appearance and flavour score were maximum in fruits stored with intermittent warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acceptability was highest in wax coated fruit stored at 3–4°C (2 wk) + 20°C (1 wk) cycle.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
wax coatede1
Outcome
Acceptabilitye1
Direction
maximume1

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acceptability was maximum in wax coated fruits stored at 3–4°C (2 wk) + 20°C (1 wk) cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1206 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent warming and wax coating are useful for extending mandarin storage life up to 75 days with a 1-week shelf life.

Taxon
mandarint0
Treatment
intermittent warming and wax coatinge2
Outcome
storage lifee2
Qualifier
up to 75 days with 1-wk shelf life at ambient conditionse2

Verbatim

t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“Findings indicated that intermittent warming and wax coating are useful for extending the storage life of ‘Nagpur’ mandarin up to 75 days with 1-wk shelf life at ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1388 · show in text ↑

storage · disease · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.