Paper · 1980

Growth stimulation from Ethrel and the effects of gibberellic acid when applied to sugarcane.

M. S. J. Clowes

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ethrel (48%) at 1,5 litres product per hectare was applied during a period of active summer growth, to different varieties of sugarcane in the coastal and midlands regions. The treated cane was about one year old and was considered mature at the time of spraying (i.e. juice purity was over 80 per cent). Results showed that Ethrel stimulated growth on varieties NCo293, N55/805 and NCo310 by causing additional elongation of the upper internodes which were still elongating at the time of spraying. This stimulation in growth resulted in an increase in stalk mass and a concurrent reduction in sucrose per cent cane. NCo376, currently the most widely grown variety in South Africa, did not respond to treatment with Ethrel. These results further emphasize the importance of maturity testing of cane in the rainfed regions before applying Ethrel as a chemical ripener. Pro-Gibb Plus, a 10 per cent formulation of gibberellic acid (GA,), was applied between January and September usually as a double application of 690g product per hectare on each occasion. Trials were conducted in each of the three main ecological regions. Results showed that growth was stimulated only on variety NCo293 which received the first application of ProGibb Plus in January. The remainder of the trials were carried out on variety NCo376 which did not respond during the cooler winter months between April and September, even when irrigation water was applied. The effects of Ethrel and gibberellic acid (GA,) are compared and the possibilities of these plant growth regulators are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel stimulated upper internode elongation in NCo293, N55/805 and NCo310.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
NCo293, N55/805 and NCo310e0
Treatment
Ethrele0
Outcome
elongation of the upper internodese0
Direction
additionale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Ethrel stimulated growth on varieties NCo293, N55/805 and NCo310 by causing additional elongation of the upper internodes which were still elongating at the time of spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel-induced growth increased stalk mass.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Ethrele1
Outcome
stalk masse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This stimulation in growth resulted in an increase in stalk mass and a concurrent reduction in sucrose per cent cane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–617 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that Ethrel stimulated growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel-induced growth reduced sucrose percent cane.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Ethrele1
Outcome
sucrose per cent canee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This stimulation in growth resulted in an increase in stalk mass and a concurrent reduction in sucrose per cent cane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–617 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that Ethrel stimulated growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NCo376 did not respond to Ethrel.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
NCo376e0
Treatment
Ethrele0
Outcome
responde0
Direction
did not responde0
Setting
South Africae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NCo376, currently the most widely grown variety in South Africa, did not respond to treatment with Ethrel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ProGibb Plus stimulated growth only in NCo293 receiving its first application in January.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
NCo293e0
Treatment
ProGibb Pluse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
first application of ProGibb Plus in Januarye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth was stimulated only on variety NCo293 which received the first application of ProGibb Plus in January.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NCo376 did not respond to Pro-Gibb Plus during April to September, even with irrigation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
NCo376e0
Treatment
Pro-Gibb Pluse1
Outcome
responde0
Direction
did not responde0
Qualifier
cooler winter months between April and September, even when irrigation water was appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The remainder of the trials were carried out on variety NCo376 which did not respond during the cooler winter months between April and September, even when irrigation water was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1440 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pro-Gibb Plus, a 10 per cent formulation of gibberellic acid (GA,)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors emphasize maturity testing in rainfed cane before Ethrel ripening treatment.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
maturity testing of cane in the rainfed regions before applying Ethrel as a chemical ripenere0

Verbatim

e0

“importance of maturity testing of cane in the rainfed regions before applying Ethrel as a chemical ripener.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.