Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Evaluation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) based strip intercropping systems for yield, competition indices and nutrient uptake

M. NEDUNCHEZHIYAN

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Dumduma, Bhubaneswar, for three consecutive years (2006-2008) to as- sess the sweet potato based strip intercropping systems with respect to productivity, nutrient uptake, competition and economic parameters. Sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas L.) + pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] strip inter- cropping system recorded significantly higher root equivalent yield (13.53 t/ha) compared to other cropping sys- tems except sole sweet potato. The total yield gain in sweet potato + pigeonpea system was 28.8% and 24.7% over sweet potato + rice ( Oryza sativa L.) and sweet potato + ragi ( Eleusine coracans L.) strip intercropping sys- tem. Root equivalent yield of sole sweet potato was significantly higher than the sole stand of other crops and strip intercropping systems except sweet potato + pigeonpea. Competition indices like land equivalent ratio (LER), area time equivalent ratio (ATER), aggressivity (A) and monetary advantage index (MAI) values were higher for sweet potato + pigeonpea strip intercropping system. Sweet potato appears more competitive than companion crops like rice or ragi. Partial competition ratio value of companion crops like maize ( Zea mays L.) and pigeonpea had an edge over sweet potato in sweet potato + maize and sweet potato + pigeonpea strip intercropping systems. The uptake of N, P and K were observed to be more when sweet potato, maize and pigeonpea were included in the strip intercropping systems. The root equivalent yield and competition indices and economic parameters indicated that the strip intercropping of sweet potato with pigeonpea is biologically sustainable and economically viable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato with pigeonpea had higher root equivalent yield than other systems except sole sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
pigeonpeae0
Interactor
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
Outcome
root equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.53 t/hae0
Comparator
other cropping sys- tems except sole sweet potatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas L.) + pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] strip inter- cropping system recorded significantly higher root equivalent yield (13.53 t/ha) compared to other cropping sys- tems except sole sweet potato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gain of sweet potato with pigeonpea was 28.8% over sweet potato with rice.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato + pigeonpeae0
Interactor
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
Second interactor
riceOryza sativae0other
Outcome
total yield gaine0
Direction
gaine0
Value
28.8%e0
Comparator
sweet potato + ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total yield gain in sweet potato + pigeonpea system was 28.8% and 24.7% over sweet potato + rice ( Oryza sativa L.) and sweet potato + ragi ( Eleusine coracans L.) strip intercropping sys- tem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gain of sweet potato with pigeonpea was 24.7% over sweet potato with ragi.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato + pigeonpeae0
Interactor
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
Second interactor
ragiEleusine coracanae0other
Outcome
total yield gaine0
Direction
gaine0
Value
24.7%e0
Comparator
sweet potato + ragie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · Second interactorAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total yield gain in sweet potato + pigeonpea system was 28.8% and 24.7% over sweet potato + rice ( Oryza sativa L.) and sweet potato + ragi ( Eleusine coracans L.) strip intercropping sys- tem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sweet potato had greater root equivalent yield than other sole crops and strip crops except sweet potato with pigeonpea.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Outcome
Root equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole stand of other crops and strip intercropping systems except sweet potato + pigeonpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root equivalent yield of sole sweet potato was significantly higher than the sole stand of other crops and strip intercropping systems except sweet potato + pigeonpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato with pigeonpea had higher competition and monetary indices.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Interactor
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER), area time equivalent ratio (ATER), aggressivity (A) and monetary advantage index (MAI) valuese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition indices like land equivalent ratio (LER), area time equivalent ratio (ATER), aggressivity (A) and monetary advantage index (MAI) values were higher for sweet potato + pigeonpea strip intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato appeared more competitive than rice or ragi.

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Interactor
riceOryza sativae0other
Second interactor
ragiEleusine coracanae0other
Outcome
more competitivee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
companion crops like rice or ragie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · Second interactorAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato appears more competitive than companion crops like rice or ragi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize had a partial competition ratio advantage over sweet potato in their intercrop.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
Partial competition ratio valuee0
Direction
had an edgee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partial competition ratio value of companion crops like maize ( Zea mays L.) and pigeonpea had an edge over sweet potato in sweet potato + maize and sweet potato + pigeonpea strip intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea had a partial competition ratio advantage over sweet potato in their intercrop.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Interactor
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
Outcome
Partial competition ratio valuee0
Direction
had an edgee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partial competition ratio value of companion crops like maize ( Zea mays L.) and pigeonpea had an edge over sweet potato in sweet potato + maize and sweet potato + pigeonpea strip intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K uptake was greater in strips including sweet potato, maize and pigeonpea.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Second interactor
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · Second interactorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of N, P and K were observed to be more when sweet potato, maize and pigeonpea were included in the strip intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1481 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato with pigeonpea was judged biologically sustainable and economically viable.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Interactor
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
Outcome
strip intercropping of sweet potato with pigeonpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root equivalent yield and competition indices and economic parameters indicated that the strip intercropping of sweet potato with pigeonpea is biologically sustainable and economically viable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1678 · show in text ↑

Cajanus cajan · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.