Paper · 1980 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Comparative effectiveness and economics of mechanical and chemical methods of control of Parthenium hysterophorus Linn.

T. V. Muniyappa; T. V. R. Prasad; K. Krishnamurthy

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two separate studies involving selected pre-emergent herbicides, post-emergent herbicides and mechanical control of Parthenium at blooming stage under wasteland condition were made during late kharif 1977 to compare the effectiveness and economics of different control methods. Among the post-emergent herbicides, diquat (1,1’-ethylene-2,2’-dipyridylium bromide) at 0.5 kg/ha caused cent per cent mortality by 15th day, while other herbicides like MSMA (Mono sodium methane arsonate) at 2.61 kg/ha, glyphosate [N-(phosphono methyl) glycine] at 0.9 kg/ha, 2,4-D sodium salt (sodium salt of 2,4-dichloro phenoxy acetic acid) at 6.0 kg/ha, 2, 4-D amine salt (5.4 kg/ha), dicamba (2-methoxy-3, 6-dichlorobenzoic acid) at 2.05 kg/ha and picloram (4-amino-3, 5, 6-trichloropiColinic acid) at 1.61 kg/ha, caused 98 to 100% mortality by 45th day after spraying. 2, 4-D compounds were slightly slower in causing mortality of the weed. All herbicides reduced dry weight of the weed considerably. The fresh weed emergence count made upto 90 days after complete mortality of the weed indicated that picloram had the least weed count (1/sq. m), followed by dicamba (7) and 2, 4-D compounds (22–24). While it was high in MSMA, glyphosate and diquat (254 to 362/sq. m.) sprayed plots. The weed count in the control plot was 676/sq. m. Cutting the weed to the ground level caused only 20% mortality. Uprooting of the weed did not result in regrowth of the weed and there were innumerable fresh sprouts. Among the pre emergent herbicides, atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethyl amino-6-isopropylamine s-triazine) at 1.25 to 1.4 kg/ha, terbutryne (2-methylthio-4-ethyl amino-6-ter-butyl amino s-triazine) at 6.0 kg/ha and RH 8817 (coded product, 2.8 to 5.8 lit/ha of commercial formulation) were most effective in preventing the weed emergence upto 150 days after spraying followed by 2,4-D amine salt (2.8 to 5.0 kg/ha) and 2, 4-D Na salt (2.8 to 4.0 kg/ha). 2, 4-D slow release (1.4 to 2.8 kg/ha) was not so effective as compared to other 2, 4-D compounds. However, this needs confirmation. The study indicated utility of pre and post-emergent herbicides application in succession for better control of the weed under wasteland condition to a reasonable period of time. The herbicides proved economical than mechanical methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diquat at 0.5 kg/ha caused complete mortality by day 15.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
diquat (1,1’-ethylene-2,2’-dipyridylium bromide) at 0.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
cent per cente0
Qualifier
by 15th daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diquat (1,1’-ethylene-2,2’-dipyridylium bromide) at 0.5 kg/ha caused cent per cent mortality by 15th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other listed post-emergent herbicides caused 98 to 100% mortality by day 45.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
MSMA (Mono sodium methane arsonate) at 2.61 kg/hae0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
causede0
Value
98 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSMA (Mono sodium methane arsonate) at 2.61 kg/ha, glyphosate [N-(phosphono methyl) glycine] at 0.9 kg/ha, 2,4-D sodium salt (sodium salt of 2,4-dichloro phenoxy acetic acid) at 6.0 kg/ha, 2, 4-D amine salt (5.4 kg/ha), dicamba (2-methoxy-3, 6-dichlorobenzoic acid) at 2.05 kg/ha and picloram (4-amino-3, 5, 6-trichloropiColinic acid) at 1.61 kg/ha, caused 98 to 100% mortality by 45th day after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D compounds caused mortality slightly more slowly.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Outcome
mortality of the weede0
Direction
slightly slowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2, 4-D compounds were slightly slower in causing mortality of the weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides considerably reduced weed dry weight.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
All herbicidese0
Outcome
dry weight of the weede0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicides reduced dry weight of the weed considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picloram plots had the least new weed emergence, 1/sq. m.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
piclorame0
Outcome
weed counte0
Direction
leaste0
Value
1/sq. me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“picloram had the least weed count (1/sq. m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plots had 676 new weeds per square metre.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Outcome
weed counte0
Value
676/sq. me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed count in the control plot was 676/sq. m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting weeds to ground level caused only 20% mortality.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
Cutting the weed to the ground levele0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
onlye0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cutting the weed to the ground level caused only 20% mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uprooted weeds did not regrow.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
Uprooting of the weede0
Outcome
regrowth of the weede0
Direction
did not resulte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uprooting of the weed did not result in regrowth of the weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uprooting was followed by innumerable fresh sprouts.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
Uprooting of the weede1
Outcome
innumerable fresh sproutse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were innumerable fresh sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1485 · show in text ↑
e1

“Uprooting of the weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine, terbutryne and RH 8817 were most effective at preventing emergence for 150 days.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethyl amino-6-isopropylamine s-triazine) at 1.25 to 1.4 kg/hae0
Outcome
weed emergencee0
Direction
most effective in preventinge0
Qualifier
upto 150 days after sprayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethyl amino-6-isopropylamine s-triazine) at 1.25 to 1.4 kg/ha, terbutryne (2-methylthio-4-ethyl amino-6-ter-butyl amino s-triazine) at 6.0 kg/ha and RH 8817 (coded product, 2.8 to 5.8 lit/ha of commercial formulation) were most effective in preventing the weed emergence upto 150 days after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow-release 2,4-D was less effective than other 2,4-D compounds, pending confirmation.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Treatment
2, 4-D slow release (1.4 to 2.8 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
not so effectivee0
Direction
not so effectivee0
Qualifier
this needs confirmatione0
Comparator
other 2, 4-D compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2, 4-D slow release (1.4 to 2.8 kg/ha) was not so effective as compared to other 2, 4-D compounds. However, this needs confirmation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended successive pre- and post-emergent herbicide applications for sustained control.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Outcome
pre and post-emergent herbicides application in succession for better control of the weede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“utility of pre and post-emergent herbicides application in succession for better control of the weed under wasteland condition to a reasonable period of time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2083–2240 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides were more economical than mechanical control.

Taxon
Parthenium hysterophorusParthenium hysterophorust0
Outcome
economicale0
Direction
economicale0
Comparator
mechanical methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicides proved economical than mechanical methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2242–2298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Parthenium hysterophorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–113 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Parthenium hysterophorusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.