Paper · 2011

STUDY ON SOME CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS ON THE VASE LIFE OF TWO CULTIVARS OF CUT ROSES

S. Mohammadi Ostad Kalayeh; Y. Mostofi; Majid Basirat

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rose (Rosa hybrida L.) is one of the mostly cultivated cut flowers in Iran and around the world. The study was carried out to increase the vase life and quality of cut rose ‘Grand Prix` and ‘Avallanche` by using various floral preservative solutions. Floral preservative solutions were AgNO3, 8-HQS, nano silver and distilled water. Treatments were compared with tap water as control. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design. The effects of applied treatments on longevity and quality of cut rose flowers were evaluated by using the percentage of opening the flower, flower diameter, the vase life and relative fresh weight. Results showed that the flowers treated with 8-HQS (250 mg l-1) +nano silver (2mg l-1) had the highest flower diameter and the percentage of opening the flower among treatments. Maximum vase life (14.33 d) of cut rose obtained with (nano silver 2mg l-1), and minimum (6.54 d) with AgNO3. The vase life of control was 5.79 d.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

8-HQS plus nano silver produced the highest flower diameter and opening percentage.

Taxon
Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare0
Treatment
8-HQS (250 mg l-1) +nano silver (2mg l-1)e1
Outcome
flower diameter and the percentage of opening the flowere1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
among treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“flowers treated with 8-HQS (250 mg l-1) +nano silver (2mg l-1) had the highest flower diameter and the percentage of opening the flower among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver at 2 mg l-1 yielded maximum vase life of 14.33 days.

Taxon
Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare0
Treatment
nano silver 2mg l-1e1
Outcome
vase lifee1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
14.33 de1
Comparator
tap watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum vase life (14.33 d) of cut rose obtained with (nano silver 2mg l-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–904 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatments were compared with tap water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AgNO3 gave minimum vase life of 6.54 days.

Taxon
Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare0
Treatment
AgNO3e1
Outcome
vase lifee2
Direction
minimume1
Value
6.54 de1
Comparator
tap watere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“minimum (6.54 d) with AgNO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–937 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum vase life (14.33 d) of cut rose obtained with (nano silver 2mg l-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–904 · show in text ↑
e3

“Treatments were compared with tap water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tap-water control had a vase life of 5.79 days.

Taxon
Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare0
Outcome
vase lifee1
Value
5.79 de1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“The vase life of control was 5.79 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–974 · show in text ↑

silver atom · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silver(1+) nitrate · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silver atom · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.