Paper · 1985 · Nematropica

Combinations of 1,3-D and Aldicarb for Management of Meloidogyne arenaria in Peanuts

R. Rodrı́guez-Kábana; C. F. Weaver; P. S. King

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The efficacy of planting time applications of the fumigant 1,3-D (Telone(?) II) and the systemic nematicide aldicarb (Temik(?) 15G) for control of Meloidogyne arenaria in 'Florunner' peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was studied in a field near Headland, Alabama. Aldicarb was applied at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ai/ha in a 20 cm band with the seed furrow in the middle; 1,3-D was injected to a depth of 25 cm at rates of 17.2, 34.4, and 51.6 L/ha using 2 injectors per row set 20 cm apart with the seed furrow in the middle between the injectors. All possible combination treatments with the 2 nematicides at these rates were also studied. A treatment of 16.8 L/ha of EDB applied as described for 1,3-D was included as a standard. The experiment was conducted in the same field in 1983 and 1984. There was no interaction between the effects of aldicarb and 1,3-D on either yield or soil larval populations of M. arenaria. Aldicarb increased yield (Y) in a manner best described by Y = Ym-e where k and C are constan

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb and 1,3-D effects did not interact for yield.

Treatment
aldicarb and 1,3-De0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no interactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no interaction between the effects of aldicarb and 1,3-D on either yield or soil larval populations of M. arenaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb and 1,3-D effects did not interact for M. arenaria soil larval populations.

Treatment
aldicarb and 1,3-De0
Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0pathogen
Outcome
soil larval populations of M. arenariae0
Direction
no interactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no interaction between the effects of aldicarb and 1,3-D on either yield or soil larval populations of M. arenaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb increased peanut yield.

Treatment
Aldicarbe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aldicarb increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑

aldicarb · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.