Paper · 2008 · Indian journal of plant protection

Bioefficacy of New Formulation of Spinosad 45 SC Against Bollworm Complex in Cotton

G. A. Yadav; B.B. Bhosle; B.V. Bhede; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Efficacy of spinosad 45 SC (spinosyn A 50% minimum and spinosyn D 50% maximum), a new formulation was evaluated against cotton bollworm complex along with commercial spinosad (Tracer 45 SC), indoxacarb, chlorypyriphos, cypermethrin, imidacloprid and dimethoate during Kharif 2006 at Sericulture Research Unit, Department of Entomology, M.A.U., Parbhani (M.S.). Spinosad (Spinosyn A 50% minimum and Spinosyn D 50% maximum) @ 100, 75 and 50 g.a.i., resulted in lowest incidence of bollworms in fruiting bodies and was significantly superior to indoxacarb, chlorpyriphos, tracer and cypermethrin. The lowest per cent infestation in shed material, bolls at harvest, locules at harvest due to bollworms were observed in new formulations of spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./ha and its lower doses. The significant and lowest bad kapas was recorded in spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./ha followed by its lower doses. It was observed that spinosad (Tracer) 25 g a.i./ha, Spinosad 50 g a.i./ha, dimethoate 200 g a.i./ha and spinosad @ 75 g a.i./ha were found to be more suitable to conserve natural enemies. The maximum seed cotton yield was (964.4 kg/ha) recorded in spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./ha. Thus, spinosad 45% SC (Spinosad A 50% minimum and spinosad D 50% maximum) @ 100 g a.i./ha proved effective for the management of bollworms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad at 100, 75 and 50 g.a.i. gave the lowest bollworm incidence in fruiting bodies and exceeded comparison insecticides.

Treatment
Spinosad (Spinosyn A 50% minimum and Spinosyn D 50% maximum) @ 100, 75 and 50 g.a.i.e0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
incidence of bollworms in fruiting bodiese0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
indoxacarb, chlorpyriphos, tracer and cypermethrine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinosad (Spinosyn A 50% minimum and Spinosyn D 50% maximum) @ 100, 75 and 50 g.a.i., resulted in lowest incidence of bollworms in fruiting bodies and was significantly superior to indoxacarb, chlorpyriphos, tracer and cypermethrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New spinosad formulations at 100 g.a.i./ha and lower doses had the lowest infestation of shed material, bolls and locules.

Treatment
spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./ha and its lower dosese0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
per cent infestation in shed material, bolls at harvest, locules at harvest due to bollwormse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest per cent infestation in shed material, bolls at harvest, locules at harvest due to bollworms were observed in new formulations of spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./ha and its lower doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad at 100 g.a.i./ha produced the lowest bad kapas, followed by lower doses.

Treatment
spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./hae0
Outcome
bad kapase0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
its lower dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The significant and lowest bad kapas was recorded in spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./ha followed by its lower doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tracer at 25 g a.i./ha was suitable for conserving natural enemies.

Treatment
spinosad (Tracer) 25 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
conserve natural enemiese0
Direction
more suitablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“spinosad (Tracer) 25 g a.i./ha, Spinosad 50 g a.i./ha, dimethoate 200 g a.i./ha and spinosad @ 75 g a.i./ha were found to be more suitable to conserve natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad at 50 g a.i./ha was suitable for conserving natural enemies.

Treatment
Spinosad 50 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
conserve natural enemiese0
Direction
more suitablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinosad 50 g a.i./ha, dimethoate 200 g a.i./ha and spinosad @ 75 g a.i./ha were found to be more suitable to conserve natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate at 200 g a.i./ha was suitable for conserving natural enemies.

Treatment
dimethoate 200 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
conserve natural enemiese0
Direction
more suitablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“dimethoate 200 g a.i./ha and spinosad @ 75 g a.i./ha were found to be more suitable to conserve natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad at 75 g a.i./ha was suitable for conserving natural enemies.

Treatment
spinosad @ 75 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
conserve natural enemiese0
Direction
more suitablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“spinosad @ 75 g a.i./ha were found to be more suitable to conserve natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 100 g.a.i./ha gave maximum seed cotton yield of 964.4 kg/ha.

Treatment
spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./hae0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
964.4 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield was (964.4 kg/ha) recorded in spinosad 45% SC 100 g.a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1176 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that spinosad 100 g a.i./ha manages bollworms effectively.

Treatment
spinosad 45% SC (Spinosad A 50% minimum and spinosad D 50% maximum) @ 100 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
management of bollwormse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“spinosad 45% SC (Spinosad A 50% minimum and spinosad D 50% maximum) @ 100 g a.i./ha proved effective for the management of bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1316 · show in text ↑

spinosad · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spinosad · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.