Abstract
Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar to study the effect of Trichoderma inoculated trash, nitrogen level and biofertilizer on yield, nutrient uptake, juice quality of sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) and soil nutrient availability in calciorthents. Trash was inoculated with Trichoderma viride @ 500 g/t, one week before planting and applied @ 10 t/ha alone or in conjunction with different levels of N (75,112.5 and 150 kg/ha). Application of trash alone increased the mean cane yield by 1.8% over control (45.4 t/ha) and with N levels 75,112.5 and 150 kg/ha, increase in cane yield were 5.5, 3.3 and 0.8%, respectively over N applied alone. Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone while, available N by 7.0, 10.3 and 8.6%, P by 2.9, 7.6 and 4.6% and K by 7.4, 4.6 and 5.3%, respectively. Addition of trash and biofertilizer alongwith recommended dose of nitrogen (150 kg/ha) gave the highest net income (Rs. 22,832/ha) and B:C ratio (1.43). Hence, addition of Tricho- derma inoculated trash @10 t/ha alongwith 150 kg N/ha and Azotobacter @ 4 kg/ha were found beneficial for sus- taining soil health, enhancing sugarcane productivity and getting higher net returns.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Trash alone increased mean cane yield by 1.8% over control (45.4 t/ha) at Pusa, Bihar.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Application of trash alone increased the mean cane yield by 1.8% over control (45.4 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 75 kg/ha increased cane yield by 5.5% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“and with N levels 75,112.5 and 150 kg/ha, increase in cane yield were 5.5, 3.3 and 0.8%, respectively over N applied alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 112.5 kg/ha increased cane yield by 3.3% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“and with N levels 75,112.5 and 150 kg/ha, increase in cane yield were 5.5, 3.3 and 0.8%, respectively over N applied alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 150 kg/ha increased cane yield by 0.8% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“and with N levels 75,112.5 and 150 kg/ha, increase in cane yield were 5.5, 3.3 and 0.8%, respectively over N applied alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 75 kg/ha improved organic carbon by 8.2% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 112.5 kg/ha improved organic carbon by 11.3% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 150 kg/ha improved organic carbon by 13.6% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 75 kg/ha improved available N by 7.0% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“available N by 7.0, 10.3 and 8.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 112.5 kg/ha improved available N by 10.3% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“available N by 7.0, 10.3 and 8.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 150 kg/ha improved available N by 8.6% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“available N by 7.0, 10.3 and 8.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 75 kg/ha improved P by 2.9% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“P by 2.9, 7.6 and 4.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 112.5 kg/ha improved P by 7.6% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“P by 2.9, 7.6 and 4.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 150 kg/ha improved P by 4.6% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“P by 2.9, 7.6 and 4.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 75 kg/ha improved K by 7.4% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“K by 7.4, 4.6 and 5.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 112.5 kg/ha improved K by 4.6% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“K by 7.4, 4.6 and 5.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash with N at 150 kg/ha improved K by 5.3% over N applied alone.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Field experiments were conducted during 2006-07 to 2008-09 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Pusa, Bihar”
e2“Trash applied with 75,112.5 and 150 kg N/ha improved the organic carbon by 8.2, 11.3 and 13.6%, respectively over N applied alone”
e3“K by 7.4, 4.6 and 5.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash and biofertilizer with the recommended 150 kg/ha N gave the highest net income (Rs. 22,832/ha).
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- Addition of trash and biofertilizer alongwith recommended dose of nitrogen (150 kg/ha)e1
- Outcome
- net incomee1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- Rs. 22,832/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Addition of trash and biofertilizer alongwith recommended dose of nitrogen (150 kg/ha) gave the highest net income (Rs. 22,832/ha) and B:C ratio (1.43)”
Claim · model-written summary
Trash and biofertilizer with the recommended 150 kg/ha N gave the highest B:C ratio (1.43).
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- Addition of trash and biofertilizer alongwith recommended dose of nitrogen (150 kg/ha)e1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 1.43e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“Addition of trash and biofertilizer alongwith recommended dose of nitrogen (150 kg/ha) gave the highest net income (Rs. 22,832/ha) and B:C ratio (1.43)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend trash inoculated with Trichoderma plus 150 kg N/ha and Azotobacter for enhancing sugarcane productivity.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”
e1“enhancing sugarcane productivity”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.