Paper · 2013

Improved drought stress tolerance of white clover through hybridisation with Trifolium uniflorum L.

S. N. Nichols; Rainer Hofmann; Isabelle M. Verry; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of hybridisation with Trifolium uniflorum L. on drought resistance of Trifolium repens L. (white clover). Shoot dry weight of backcross 1 (BC1) hybrids was reduced less by water stress than for backcross 2 (BC2) hybrids and white clover, as were key morphological traits such as leaf area. Under water stress, important differences for the BC1 generation compared to white clover also included lower senescence, higher stolon density, increased root dry weight, and a higher maximum nodal root diameter. Drought decreased the net photosynthetic rate by up to 48% in BC2 and white clover, but there was no significant effect on the BC1 generation. BC1 hybrids were therefore more resistant to water stress than white clover. Smaller effects on stolon morphology suggest BC1 hybrids were better able to maintain cell turgor and growth, and maintenance of photosynthesis under drought may have contributed to smaller reductions in productivity. The findings suggest that BC1 hybrids may be able to maintain higher water uptake during drought than white clover by increased allocation to root biomass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight of BC1 hybrids was reduced less by water stress than that of BC2 hybrids and white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Material
backcross 1 (BC1) hybridse0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Shoot dry weighte0
Direction
reduced lesse0
Comparator
backcross 2 (BC2) hybrids and white clovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry weight of backcross 1 (BC1) hybrids was reduced less by water stress than for backcross 2 (BC2) hybrids and white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area of BC1 hybrids was also reduced less by water stress than that of BC2 hybrids and white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Material
backcross 1 (BC1) hybridse0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
reduced lesse0
Comparator
backcross 2 (BC2) hybrids and white clovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry weight of backcross 1 (BC1) hybrids was reduced less by water stress than for backcross 2 (BC2) hybrids and white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“as were key morphological traits such as leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, BC1 plants showed lower senescence than white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
senescencee1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
white clovert0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–364 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, BC1 plants had higher stolon density than white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
stolon densitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
white clovert0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–364 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher stolon density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, BC1 plants had increased root dry weight compared with white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
white clovert0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–364 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, BC1 plants had a higher maximum nodal root diameter than white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
maximum nodal root diametere1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
white clovert0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–364 · show in text ↑
e1

“a higher maximum nodal root diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased the net photosynthetic rate by up to 48% in BC2 hybrids and white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Material
BC2e0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought decreased the net photosynthetic rate by up to 48% in BC2 and white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought had no significant effect on the net photosynthetic rate of the BC1 generation.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Material
BC1 generatione1
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought decreased the net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–605 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was no significant effect on the BC1 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 hybrids were concluded to be more resistant to water stress than white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Material
BC1 hybridse0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
more resistant to water stresse0
Direction
more resistante0
Comparator
white clovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BC1 hybrids were therefore more resistant to water stress than white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–778 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smaller effects on stolon morphology suggest that BC1 hybrids were better able to maintain cell turgor and growth.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Material
BC1 hybridse0
Outcome
maintain cell turgor and growthe0
Qualifier
Smaller effects on stolon morphologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Smaller effects on stolon morphology suggest BC1 hybrids were better able to maintain cell turgor and growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–888 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 hybrids may maintain higher water uptake during drought than white clover through increased allocation to root biomass.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Material
BC1 hybridse0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
higher water uptakee0
Qualifier
increased allocation to root biomasse0
Comparator
white clovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BC1 hybrids may be able to maintain higher water uptake during drought than white clover by increased allocation to root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1152 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

28 papers: 7 positive, 21 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.