Paper · 2008 · Annals of Applied Biology

Production and detoxification of H2O2 in lettuce plants exposed to selenium

J.J. Ríos; B. Blasco; L.M. Cervilla; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
120
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Selenium is considered an essential element for animals. Despite that it has not been demonstrated to be essential for higher plants, it has been attributed with a protective role against reactive oxygen species in plants subjected to stress. In this study, lettuce plants ( Lactuca sativa cv. Philipus) received different application rates (5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 120 μM) of selenite or selenate, with the aim of testing the effect of Se on the production and detoxification of H 2 O 2 in non‐stressed plants. The results indicate that the form selenate is less toxic than selenite; that is, the plants tolerated and responded positively to this element, and even increasing in growth up to a rate of 40 μM for the form selenate. On the contrary, the application of selenite triggered a higher foliar concentration of H 2 O 2 and a higher induction of lipid peroxidation [malondialdehyde content and lipoxygenase activity] in comparison to that observed after the selenate application. Also, the plants treated with selenate induced higher increases in enzymes that detoxify H 2 O 2 , especially ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione (GSH) peroxidase, as well as an increase in the foliar concentration of antioxidant compounds such as ascorbate and GSH. These data indicate that an application of selenate at low rates can be used to prevent the induction in plants of the antioxidant system, thereby improving stress resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenate was less toxic than selenite.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
selenatee0
Outcome
toxice0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
selenitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the form selenate is less toxic than selenite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenate increased lettuce growth through 40 μM.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
selenatee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
40 μMe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing in growth up to a rate of 40 μM for the form selenate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenite caused higher foliar hydrogen peroxide than selenate.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
selenitee0
Outcome
foliar concentration of H 2 O 2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
selenate applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of selenite triggered a higher foliar concentration of H 2 O 2 and a higher induction of lipid peroxidation [malondialdehyde content and lipoxygenase activity] in comparison to that observed after the selenate application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenite caused higher lipid peroxidation indicators than selenate.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
selenitee0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation [malondialdehyde content and lipoxygenase activity]e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
selenate applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of selenite triggered a higher foliar concentration of H 2 O 2 and a higher induction of lipid peroxidation [malondialdehyde content and lipoxygenase activity] in comparison to that observed after the selenate application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenate increased ascorbate peroxidase and GSH peroxidase activities.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
selenatee0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione (GSH) peroxidasee0
Direction
higher increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with selenate induced higher increases in enzymes that detoxify H 2 O 2 , especially ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione (GSH) peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenate increased foliar ascorbate and GSH.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
selenatee1
Outcome
foliar concentration of antioxidant compounds such as ascorbate and GSHe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the foliar concentration of antioxidant compounds such as ascorbate and GSH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“the form selenate is less toxic than selenite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–594 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest low rate selenate for stress resistance.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
selenate at low ratese0
Outcome
improving stress resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an application of selenate at low rates can be used to prevent the induction in plants of the antioxidant system, thereby improving stress resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–55 · show in text ↑

selenate · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.