Paper · 1992 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Differential Susceptibility of Chickpea Cultivars to Iron Chlorosis Grown on Caleareous Soils of Pakistan

Abdul Rashid; Jalal Ud Din

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan. There were varietal differences. The cause of the chlorosis was Fe deficiency. Total Fe content of leaf tissue was not related with chlorosis. but o-phenanthroline extractable ferrous (Fe2+) content of fresh leaves was related fairly well with the severity of chlorosis. Soil application of sequestrene, and foliar sprays of sequestrene and FeSO4 solution corrected the chlorosis. Best control of chlorosis and maximum increase in grain yield of chickpea was obtained with foliar applied sequestrene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chlorosis of chickpea was caused by Fe deficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
chlorosise1
Qualifier
Fe deficiencye1
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cause of the chlorosis was Fe deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–238 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Fe content of leaf tissue was not related to chlorosis in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuee2
Outcome
Total Fe content of leaf tissuee2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total Fe content of leaf tissue was not related with chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–302 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

o-phenanthroline extractable ferrous (Fe2+) content of fresh leaves was fairly well related to chlorosis severity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
fresh leavese3
Compound
ferrous (Fe2+)e3
Outcome
severity of chlorosise3
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e3

“o-phenanthroline extractable ferrous (Fe2+) content of fresh leaves was related fairly well with the severity of chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of sequestrene corrected chlorosis in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Soil application of sequestrenee4
Outcome
chlorosise4
Direction
correctede4
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil application of sequestrene, and foliar sprays of sequestrene and FeSO4 solution corrected the chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays of sequestrene corrected chlorosis in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
foliar sprays of sequestrenee4
Outcome
chlorosise4
Direction
correctede4
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil application of sequestrene, and foliar sprays of sequestrene and FeSO4 solution corrected the chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays of FeSO4 solution corrected chlorosis in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
FeSO4 solutione4
Outcome
chlorosise4
Direction
correctede4
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil application of sequestrene, and foliar sprays of sequestrene and FeSO4 solution corrected the chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applied sequestrene gave the best control of chlorosis in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
foliar applied sequestrenee5
Outcome
control of chlorosise5
Direction
Best controle5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Best control of chlorosis and maximum increase in grain yield of chickpea was obtained with foliar applied sequestrene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applied sequestrene gave the maximum increase in grain yield of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
foliar applied sequestrenee5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
maximum increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Best control of chlorosis and maximum increase in grain yield of chickpea was obtained with foliar applied sequestrene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–660 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea varieties differed in susceptibility to chlorosis.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
varietiese0
Outcome
varietal differencese6
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were carried out to investigate the cause of chlorosis in some varieties of chickpea grown on calcareous soils of Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e6

“There were varietal differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–192 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.