Paper · 2009 · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

Pollen and seed yield components of water-stressed cultivated and weedy rice

Adam Puteh; Normaliana Jali; Mohd Razi Ismail; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Water stress occurring during the early phase of the reproductive growth stage may influence plant reproduction success. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the responses of pollen and seed yield components to water stress during anthesis in cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties and weedy rice strains. Studies were conducted in 2007 using three cultivated rice varieties; MR 84, MR 219 and MR 232. In 2008 three weedy rice strains were obtained from Seberang Perak, Kuala Pilah and Tanjung Karang areas. Studies were conducted in the field where plants were grown in polybags and submerged in polyethylene tanks. Prior to anthesis, plants were subjected to water stress by taking the plants out of the polyethylene tanks for five days. Flag leaf relative water content (RWC) and relative injury (RI) were measured daily during the stressed period. Pollen production and pollen viability were measured upon re-watering. Seed yield components measured were grain number per panicle, 100-grain weight, percentage filled grain and percentage spikelet sterility at harvest. Water stress caused a 13 – 34% decline in the number of pollen grains per anther in cultivated varieties but increased pollen production in weedy strains. Percentage pollen viability declined by 40 – 45% in MR 219 and MR 232, but increased by 15% in MR 84 when plants were water-stressed. Percent pollen viability in weedy strains never exceeded 52% and significantly declined with water stress. For cultivated varieties, water stress increased total number of grain per panicle by 31%. In weedy strains, only Seberang Perak increased in the number of grain per panicle due to water stress. Spikelet sterility was relatively higher in cultivated varieties (16 – 50%) compared with weedy strains (10 – 23%). The 100-grain weight was not affected by water stress in both cultivated varieties and weedy strains. This study indicated that weedy rice strains would gain a competitive advantage by producing more filled grains when water deficit occurs during anthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced pollen grains per anther in cultivated rice by 13 – 34%.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
number of pollen grains per anthere0
Direction
declinee0
Value
13 – 34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress caused a 13 – 34% decline in the number of pollen grains per anther in cultivated varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased pollen production in weedy rice.

Taxon
weedy ricet0
Treatment
water-stressedt0
Outcome
pollen productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but increased pollen production in weedy strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“water-stressed cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability declined by 40 – 45% in stressed MR 219 and MR 232.

Material
MR 219 and MR 232e0
Treatment
water-stressedt0
Outcome
Percentage pollen viabilitye0
Direction
declinede0
Value
40 – 45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage pollen viability declined by 40 – 45% in MR 219 and MR 232”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“water-stressed cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability rose by 15% in stressed MR 84.

Material
MR 84e0
Treatment
water-stressede0
Outcome
Pollent0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but increased by 15% in MR 84 when plants were water-stressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pollen and seed yield components of water-stressed cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy rice pollen viability never exceeded 52%.

Taxon
weedy ricet0
Outcome
Percent pollen viabilitye0
Direction
never exceedede0
Value
52%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Percent pollen viability in weedy strains never exceeded 52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced weedy rice pollen viability.

Taxon
weedy ricet0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Percent pollen viabilitye0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Percent pollen viability in weedy strains never exceeded 52% and significantly declined with water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased cultivated rice grain number per panicle by 31%.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
total number of grain per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For cultivated varieties, water stress increased total number of grain per panicle by 31%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among weedy strains, only Seberang Perak increased grain number per panicle under water stress.

Taxon
weedy ricet0
Material
Seberang Perake0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
number of grain per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In weedy strains, only Seberang Perak increased in the number of grain per panicle due to water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivated rice had higher spikelet sterility than weedy rice.

Outcome
Spikelet sterilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
16 – 50%e0
Qualifier
10 – 23%e0
Comparator
weedy strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spikelet sterility was relatively higher in cultivated varieties (16 – 50%) compared with weedy strains (10 – 23%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress did not affect 100-grain weight in either rice group.

Taxon
cultivated and weedy ricet0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
100-grain weighte0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 100-grain weight was not affected by water stress in both cultivated varieties and weedy strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1895 · show in text ↑
t0

“cultivated and weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred weedy rice gains a competitive advantage through more filled grains under anthesis drought.

Taxon
weedy ricee0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
competitive advantagee0
Qualifier
producing more filled grainse0

Verbatim

e0

“weedy rice strains would gain a competitive advantage by producing more filled grains when water deficit occurs during anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2050 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 246 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.