Paper · 2011 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response of Brassica to microenvironment modification under semi-arid agroecosystem

Tarun Adak; Bhaskar Narjary; N.V.K. CHAKRAVARTY

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during winter (rabi) season of 2005–06 and 2006–07 on a Typic Ustocrepts soils at research farm of Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi representing a semi-arid environmental condition, to evaluate the response of Brassica juncea under modified microenvironments. It was revealed that the possibility of increasing the seed yield in mustard cultivars, viz Pusa Jaikisan and BIO169–96 (developed at National Research Centre Plant Biotechnology IARI, New Delhi) was possible. Modification of microenvironment through debranching, i e removal of lower branches at the flowering and pod-filling stages so as to increase the photosynthate flow to the economic parts is found to be promising yet cheaper way. This modified microenvironment has a positive impact on growth and yield in both the years of study. Removal of lower branches at the flowering stage was found to be an alternate practice of microenvironment modification in attaining statistically higher yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microenvironment modification by debranching increased the seed yield of mustard cultivars Pusa Jaikisan and BIO169–96.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Material
Pusa Jaikisan and BIO169–96e1
Treatment
Modification of microenvironment through debranchinge2
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the response of Brassica juncea under modified microenvironments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing the seed yield in mustard cultivars, viz Pusa Jaikisan and BIO169–96”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–436 · show in text ↑
e2

“Modification of microenvironment through debranching, i e removal of lower branches at the flowering and pod-filling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified microenvironment had a positive impact on growth and yield of Brassica juncea in both years of study.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Treatment
modified microenvironmente3
Outcome
growth and yielde3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Qualifier
in both the years of studye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the response of Brassica juncea under modified microenvironments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e3

“This modified microenvironment has a positive impact on growth and yield in both the years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of lower branches at the flowering stage gave statistically higher yield in Brassica juncea.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Removal of lower branches at the flowering stagee4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the response of Brassica juncea under modified microenvironments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e4

“Removal of lower branches at the flowering stage was found to be an alternate practice of microenvironment modification in attaining statistically higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1016 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.