Paper · 2002 · Applied Engineering in Agriculture

STRIP TILLAGE FOR âNOâTILLâ ROW CROP PRODUCTION

J. E. Morrison; Jr.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
49
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Strip tillage systems apply tillage procedures only to narrow strips or zones of soil where the individual rowswill be planted for the next crop. The tilled zones are no more than 25% of the field area. Strip tillage procedures for cropproduction are conservative, wherein the soil remains partially covered with protective residues while crops are planted,fertilized, grown, and harvested in the row zones. The strip tillage literature is reviewed and strip tillage defined for rowcropproduction in conservation tillage systems. Some technical alternatives are discussed and available commercial implementsare identified. Studies were conducted on both small research plots and large onfarm field plots. It was concluded that bothdeep and shallow types of strip tillage increased corn growth and yield, in some cases over conventional chisel plowing andtandem discing tillage, but there was no advantage to the use of deeper knifechisel zone treatment over shallow sweep zonetillage in the soils tested. The data was inconclusive for cotton and did not include shallow sweeptype treatments. For theconditions tested, use of the experimental strip tillage procedures will provide more management options than strict notilland higher yields than with conventional tillage in drought years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep strip tillage increased corn growth and yield in some cases over conventional tillage.

Treatment
deepe0
Outcome
corn growth and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional chisel plowing andtandem discing tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bothdeep and shallow types of strip tillage increased corn growth and yield, in some cases over conventional chisel plowing andtandem discing tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow strip tillage increased corn growth and yield in some cases over conventional tillage.

Treatment
shallow types of strip tillagee0
Outcome
corn growth and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional chisel plowing andtandem discing tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bothdeep and shallow types of strip tillage increased corn growth and yield, in some cases over conventional chisel plowing andtandem discing tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deeper knifechisel treatment had no advantage over shallow sweep tillage in tested soils.

Treatment
deeper knifechisel zone treatmente0
Outcome
no advantagee0
Direction
no advantagee0
Comparator
shallow sweep zonetillagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“there was no advantage to the use of deeper knifechisel zone treatment over shallow sweep zonetillage in the soils tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROW CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton findings were inconclusive.

Outcome
inconclusivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data was inconclusive for cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental strip tillage provided more management options than strict no tillage.

Outcome
management optionse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
strict notille0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“use of the experimental strip tillage procedures will provide more management options than strict notilland higher yields than with conventional tillage in drought years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental strip tillage gave higher yields than conventional tillage in drought years.

Treatment
experimental strip tillage procedurese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
drought yearse0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“use of the experimental strip tillage procedures will provide more management options than strict notilland higher yields than with conventional tillage in drought years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1287 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.