Abstract
The effect of dusting 2 chickpea [Cicer arietinum] cultivars, ICCX 79012 and Annigeri, with fine rock powder at flowering on the damage caused by the noctuid Helicoverpa armigera was studied in India. No significant differences in damage were observed between dusted and nondusted ICCX 79012, while damage to Annigeri was increased by dusting. Yields were significantly higher in dusted than in non-dusted plots.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Dusting cultivar ICCX 79012 with fine rock powder had no significant effect on Helicoverpa armigera damage compared with non-dusted plants.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Material
- ICCX 79012e2
- Treatment
- fine rock powdere1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae1pest - Outcome
- damagee2
- Direction
- No significant differencese2
- Comparator
- nondustede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The effect of dusting 2 chickpea [Cicer arietinum] cultivars, ICCX 79012 and Annigeri, with fine rock powder at flowering on the damage caused by the noctuid Helicoverpa armigera”
e2“No significant differences in damage were observed between dusted and nondusted ICCX 79012”
Claim · model-written summary
Dusting increased damage by Helicoverpa armigera to the chickpea cultivar Annigeri.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Material
- Annigerie3
- Treatment
- dustinge3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
- Outcome
- damagee3
- Direction
- increasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effect of dusting 2 chickpea [Cicer arietinum] cultivars, ICCX 79012 and Annigeri, with fine rock powder at flowering on the damage caused by the noctuid Helicoverpa armigera”
e3“damage to Annigeri was increased by dusting”
Claim · model-written summary
Dusting significantly increased chickpea yield compared with non-dusted plots.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- dustede4
- Outcome
- Yieldse4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- non-dusted plotse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Yields were significantly higher in dusted than in non-dusted plots”
t0“Dusting Chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
24 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.