Paper · 2006 · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)

Influence of exogenously applied glycinebetaine on the photosynthetic capacity of two differently adapted wheat cultivars under salt stress

Syed Hammad Raza; Habib‐ur‐Rehman Athar; Muhammad Ashraf

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
133
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ameliorative effect of exogenously applied glycinebetaine (GB) on photosynthetic capacity of two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance grown under salt stress was assessed. Plants were grown under field conditions at 2.84, 15 dS/m in split-split plot design. Different levels of GB (no spray NS, 0.1% Tween 20 solution, 50 and 100 mM GB in 0.1% Tween 20 solution) were exogenously applied as a foliar spray to salt tolerant (S-24) and moderately salt sensitive (MH-97) wheat cultivars under saline and non-saline conditions. Salt stress reduced the photosynthetic capacity of both cultivars. Reduction in photosynthetic rate was primarily due to stomatal limitations. Cultivar S-24 excelled MH-97 under salt stress with respect to photosynthetic rate and leaf turgor potential. Salt-induced reduction in photosynthetic capacity was ameliorated by exogenous application of GB. High accumulation of GB mainly contributes to OA, which is one of the factors for improving photosynthetic capacity under salt stress. Better osmotic adjustment or plant water status due to GB application increased the stomatal conductance and thus favored higher CO2 fixation rate. The protective effect of GB on photosynthetic pigments and GB induced reduction in transpiration rate are additional factors which might have contributed to better growth of wheat cultivars under salt stress. However, cv. S-24 was higher in photosynthetic capacity and plant water status or osmotic adjustment than MH-97, which could explain the ability of the salt tolerant S-24 to show higher salt tolerance than the moderately sensitive MH-97.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced photosynthetic capacity of both wheat cultivars.

Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salt stress reduced the photosynthetic capacity of both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–597 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate reduction was primarily attributed to stomatal limitations.

Outcome
Reduction in photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
stomatal limitationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reduction in photosynthetic rate was primarily due to stomatal limitations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-24 had higher photosynthetic rate than MH-97 under salt stress.

Material
S-24e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
excellede0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
MH-97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar S-24 excelled MH-97 under salt stress with respect to photosynthetic rate and leaf turgor potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–783 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-24 had greater leaf turgor potential than MH-97 under salt stress.

Material
S-24e0
Outcome
leaf turgor potentiale0
Direction
excellede0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
MH-97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar S-24 excelled MH-97 under salt stress with respect to photosynthetic rate and leaf turgor potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GB ameliorated salt-induced reduction in photosynthetic capacity.

Treatment
exogenous application of GBe0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salt-induced reduction in photosynthetic capacity was ameliorated by exogenous application of GB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–881 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB accumulation mainly contributes to osmotic adjustment.

Compound
GBe0
Outcome
OAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“High accumulation of GB mainly contributes to OA, which is one of the factors for improving photosynthetic capacity under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1016 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic adjustment from GB contributed to improved photosynthetic capacity under salt stress.

Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Qualifier
OAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“High accumulation of GB mainly contributes to OA, which is one of the factors for improving photosynthetic capacity under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1016 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB application increased stomatal conductance through improved osmotic adjustment or water status.

Treatment
GB applicatione0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Qualifier
Better osmotic adjustment or plant water statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Better osmotic adjustment or plant water status due to GB application increased the stomatal conductance and thus favored higher CO2 fixation rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1164 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater stomatal conductance favored higher CO2 fixation rate.

Outcome
CO2 fixation ratee0
Qualifier
stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased the stomatal conductance and thus favored higher CO2 fixation rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1164 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB protection of photosynthetic pigments might contribute to better growth under salt stress.

Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
better growthe0
Qualifier
protective effect of GB on photosynthetic pigmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protective effect of GB on photosynthetic pigments and GB induced reduction in transpiration rate are additional factors which might have contributed to better growth of wheat cultivars under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1373 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB induced reduction in transpiration might contribute to better growth under salt stress.

Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
better growthe0
Qualifier
GB induced reduction in transpiration ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protective effect of GB on photosynthetic pigments and GB induced reduction in transpiration rate are additional factors which might have contributed to better growth of wheat cultivars under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-24 had higher photosynthetic capacity and plant water status or osmotic adjustment than MH-97.

Material
S-24e0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacity and plant water status or osmotic adjustmente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MH-97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“cv. S-24 was higher in photosynthetic capacity and plant water status or osmotic adjustment than MH-97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1485 · show in text ↑

glycine betaine · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 11 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.