Paper · 1999 · Seed Science and Technology

Identification of pepper (Capsicum spp.) cultivars by field and electrophoresis tests

Carla Lucchese; Giovanni Dinelli; A. Miggiano; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Twenty pepper cultivars selected from those commonly traded and cultivated in Italy were subjected to field and laboratory identification and characterization tests. In a field trial plants were grown until fruit ripening and the main morpho-physiological characters used for distinguishing pepper cultivars were recorded from the seedling stage to plant maturity. The morpho-physiological differences observed in the field allowed the clear identification of cultivars of the same group. In the laboratory, ultrathin-layer isoelectrofocusing (UTLIEF) and SDS capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE) of the seed proteins, urea-detergent soluble and water-soluble respectively, were performed. The high resolving power of UTLIEF was suitable for detecting differences between pepper cultivars and together with densitometer analysis offered considerable potential for the characterization of pepper cultivars. The correlation with some morpho physiological characters and the advantage of providing excellent resolution in a short time indicated the possible use of UTLIEF of urea-detergent proteins as a standard identification method for pepper cultivars. Despite the low variability of the water-soluble proteins analyzed, four different electrophoregrams were detected by SDS-CGE for the twenty cultivars. The resolution and efficiency of separation confirmed SDS-CGE as a valid and complementary tool to gel electrophoresis for cultivar identification.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field morphology clearly identified cultivars in the same group.

Taxon
peppert0
Outcome
clear identification of cultivars of the same groupe0
Comparator
cultivars of the same groupe0

Verbatim

e0

“The morpho-physiological differences observed in the field allowed the clear identification of cultivars of the same group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper (Capsicum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UTLIEF resolved differences between pepper cultivars.

Taxon
peppere0
Outcome
detecting differences between pepper cultivarse0
Comparator
pepper cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“The high resolving power of UTLIEF was suitable for detecting differences between pepper cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–791 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UTLIEF combined with densitometry had potential for pepper cultivar characterization.

Taxon
peppere0
Outcome
characterization of pepper cultivarse0
Comparator
pepper cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“together with densitometer analysis offered considerable potential for the characterization of pepper cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–907 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UTLIEF of urea-detergent proteins was proposed as a standard pepper identification method.

Taxon
peppere0
Outcome
standard identification method for pepper cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“indicated the possible use of UTLIEF of urea-detergent proteins as a standard identification method for pepper cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1156 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SDS-CGE detected four electrophoregram types among twenty cultivars despite low water-soluble protein variability.

Taxon
peppert0
Outcome
different electrophoregramse0
Value
foure0
Qualifier
low variability of the water-soluble proteinse0

Verbatim

e0

“Despite the low variability of the water-soluble proteins analyzed, four different electrophoregrams were detected by SDS-CGE for the twenty cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper (Capsicum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SDS-CGE was judged a valid complementary identification tool.

Taxon
peppert0
Outcome
valid and complementary toole0
Comparator
gel electrophoresise0

Verbatim

e0

“The resolution and efficiency of separation confirmed SDS-CGE as a valid and complementary tool to gel electrophoresis for cultivar identification.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper (Capsicum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑