Paper · 1997 · Biologia Plantarum

Tolerance of rice to nickel in nutrient solution

S. Samantaray; G.R. Rout; P. Das

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

For screening tolerance of six cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa) to different concentrations of nickel (0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 μg dm3), growth parameters (root and shoot length, root and shoot dry matter production) and root and shoot tolerance indexes were tested after 7, 10 and 13 d of treatment. In presence of nickel in nutrient solution, root growth of cv. Nilgiri was enhanced, while in cvs. Subhadra, Khandagiri, Rudra, Sankar and Annapurna it decreased. The root tolerance index (RTI) and shoot tolerance index (STI) in cv. Nilgiri were high; cvs. Sankar and Khandagiri, however, showed a low RTI. Based on the standard growth parameters, six cultivars of rice were ranked in respect of their tolerance to nickel: Nilgiri > Annapurna > Subhadra > Khandagiri > Rudra > Sankar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel enhanced root growth of rice cultivar Nilgiri.

Material
Nilgirie0
Treatment
nickele0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In presence of nickel in nutrient solution, root growth of cv. Nilgiri was enhanced, while in cvs. Subhadra, Khandagiri, Rudra, Sankar and Annapurna it decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel decreased root growth of rice cultivar Subhadra.

Material
Subhadrae0
Treatment
nickele0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In presence of nickel in nutrient solution, root growth of cv. Nilgiri was enhanced, while in cvs. Subhadra, Khandagiri, Rudra, Sankar and Annapurna it decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel decreased root growth of rice cultivar Khandagiri.

Material
Khandagirie0
Treatment
nickele0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In presence of nickel in nutrient solution, root growth of cv. Nilgiri was enhanced, while in cvs. Subhadra, Khandagiri, Rudra, Sankar and Annapurna it decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel decreased root growth of rice cultivar Rudra.

Material
Rudrae0
Treatment
nickele0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In presence of nickel in nutrient solution, root growth of cv. Nilgiri was enhanced, while in cvs. Subhadra, Khandagiri, Rudra, Sankar and Annapurna it decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel decreased root growth of rice cultivar Sankar.

Material
Sankare0
Treatment
nickele0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In presence of nickel in nutrient solution, root growth of cv. Nilgiri was enhanced, while in cvs. Subhadra, Khandagiri, Rudra, Sankar and Annapurna it decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel decreased root growth of rice cultivar Annapurna.

Material
Annapurnae0
Treatment
nickele0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In presence of nickel in nutrient solution, root growth of cv. Nilgiri was enhanced, while in cvs. Subhadra, Khandagiri, Rudra, Sankar and Annapurna it decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nilgiri had high root tolerance index.

Material
Nilgirie0
Outcome
root tolerance indexe0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root tolerance index (RTI) and shoot tolerance index (STI) in cv. Nilgiri were high; cvs. Sankar and Khandagiri, however, showed a low RTI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nilgiri had high shoot tolerance index.

Material
Nilgirie0
Outcome
shoot tolerance indexe0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root tolerance index (RTI) and shoot tolerance index (STI) in cv. Nilgiri were high; cvs. Sankar and Khandagiri, however, showed a low RTI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sankar had low RTI.

Material
Sankare0
Outcome
RTIe0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root tolerance index (RTI) and shoot tolerance index (STI) in cv. Nilgiri were high; cvs. Sankar and Khandagiri, however, showed a low RTI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Khandagiri had low RTI.

Material
Khandagirie0
Outcome
RTIe0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root tolerance index (RTI) and shoot tolerance index (STI) in cv. Nilgiri were high; cvs. Sankar and Khandagiri, however, showed a low RTI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice cultivars ranked Nilgiri > Annapurna > Subhadra > Khandagiri > Rudra > Sankar for nickel tolerance.

Outcome
tolerance to nickele0
Qualifier
Nilgiri > Annapurna > Subhadra > Khandagiri > Rudra > Sankare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of rice were ranked in respect of their tolerance to nickel: Nilgiri > Annapurna > Subhadra > Khandagiri > Rudra > Sankar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–784 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

18 papers: 6 positive, 12 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.