Paper · 2001

Prospects of Using Cicer canariense for Chickpea Improvement

Mallikarjuna N. Nadagouda

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were initiated at ICRISAT to cross kabuli chickpea cv. ICCV 6 and desi cv. GL 769 using a perennial wild species, C. canariense, as the male parent. Emasculations and pollinations were carried out in the morning between 8.00 h and 10.00 h. An aqueous mixture of growth regulators consisting of gibberellic acid, NAA, and kinetin (7:1:1) was applied to the base of the pollinated pistils 5 h after pollination. Light and fluorescent microscopic studies showed that the pollen grains germinated normally on the stigma. Swelling of the pollen tubes was rarely observed. Pod initials were observed at 6 days after pollination (DAP). By 14 DAP, yellowing of the pods was observed; hence pods were harvested at 14-18 DAP. The maximum pod size obtained was 4 mm × 4.5 mm and ovule width was 2 mm. Ovules did not show growth even after 45 days of culture. Globular embryos were observed. In the pollinated pistils where growth regulators were not applied, development of pod initials was not observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen germinated normally on the stigma in the crosses.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
pollen grains germinated normallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pollen grains germinated normally on the stigma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen tube swelling was rare.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Swelling of the pollen tubes was rarely observede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Swelling of the pollen tubes was rarely observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod initials appeared six days after pollination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Pod initials were observede0
Value
6 days after pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pod initials were observed at 6 days after pollination (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods yellowed by 14 days after pollination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
yellowing of the podse0
Value
14 DAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 14 DAP, yellowing of the pods was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum pod size was 4 mm × 4.5 mm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
maximum pod sizee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4 mm × 4.5 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum pod size obtained was 4 mm × 4.5 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ovule width was 2 mm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
ovule widthe0
Value
2 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ovule width was 2 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultured ovules did not grow after 45 days.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Ovules did not show growthe0
Value
45 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ovules did not show growth even after 45 days of culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Globular embryos were observed.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Globular embryos were observede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Globular embryos were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without growth regulators, pollinated pistils did not develop pod initials.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
growth regulators were not appliede0
Outcome
development of pod initials was not observede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the pollinated pistils where growth regulators were not applied, development of pod initials was not observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.