Paper · 1979 · Phytophylactica

Changes in scab susceptibility of apple leaves as influenced by age.

W. F. S. Schwabe

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
36
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Apple leaves of different ages were inoculated with ascospores and conidia of Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint., leaf age being taken from the day the leaf was fully unfolded and flat. When ascospores were used, the greatest number of lesions occurred on leaves inoculated 3 to 5 days after unfolding. However, on a leaf area basis, leaves 2 days after unfolding were the most susceptible. When conidia were used, the greatest number of lesions occurred on leaves inoculated I to 3 days after unfolding, while on a leaf area basis leaves not fully unfolded were even more susceptible. The leaves of trees receiving a balanced nutrient solution were almost completely resistant after 12 to 13 days, i.e. at about the time leaf expansion ceased. Rate of leaf emergence was found to be influenced by temperature, but other factors were also involved. This, together with the fact that leaves of different ages differ in their susceptibility to scab, explains the great variation in scab development observed during previous infection studies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascospore inoculation yielded the greatest lesion count on leaves inoculated 3 to 5 days after unfolding.

Organ / stage
leaves inoculated 3 to 5 days after unfoldinge0
Interactor
Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.e1pathogen
Outcome
number of lesionse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When ascospores were used, the greatest number of lesions occurred on leaves inoculated 3 to 5 days after unfolding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On a leaf area basis, 2-day-old leaves were most susceptible to ascospores.

Organ / stage
leaves 2 days after unfoldinge0
Interactor
Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.e1pathogen
Outcome
most susceptiblee0
Direction
most susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on a leaf area basis, leaves 2 days after unfolding were the most susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial inoculation yielded the greatest lesion count on leaves inoculated I to 3 days after unfolding.

Organ / stage
leaves inoculated I to 3 days after unfoldinge0
Interactor
Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.e1pathogen
Outcome
number of lesionse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When conidia were used, the greatest number of lesions occurred on leaves inoculated I to 3 days after unfolding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On a leaf area basis, leaves not fully unfolded were even more susceptible to conidia.

Organ / stage
leaves not fully unfoldede0
Interactor
Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.e1pathogen
Outcome
more susceptiblee0
Direction
more susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on a leaf area basis leaves not fully unfolded were even more susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees given balanced nutrient solution had leaves almost completely resistant after 12 to 13 days.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
balanced nutrient solutione0
Interactor
Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.e1pathogen
Outcome
almost completely resistante0
Qualifier
after 12 to 13 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves of trees receiving a balanced nutrient solution were almost completely resistant after 12 to 13 days, i.e. at about the time leaf expansion ceased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature influenced the rate of leaf emergence, with other factors also involved.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
Rate of leaf emergencee0
Qualifier
other factors were also involvede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rate of leaf emergence was found to be influenced by temperature, but other factors were also involved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation in leaf emergence and age-dependent scab susceptibility explained variation in scab development during earlier infection studies.

Organ / stage
leaves of different agese0
Interactor
Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.e1pathogen
Outcome
great variation in scab developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This, together with the fact that leaves of different ages differ in their susceptibility to scab, explains the great variation in scab development observed during previous infection studies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Venluria inaequalis (eke) Wint.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑