Paper · 2017 · South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Water Status,Vegetative Growth and Yield Responses of Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc to Timing of Irrigation during Berry Ripening in the Coastal Region of South Africa

P.A. Myburgh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The effects of additional irrigation during berry ripening on water relations, growth and yield in Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc grapevines were investigated. In all treatments the grapevines were irrigated when berries reached pea size in December. One treatment received no further irrigation until after harvest. All of the remaining treatments received a second irrigation at vraison. Except for a single treatment, which was not irrigated during ripening, these treatments received a third irrigation at either 14, 21, 28 or 31 days after vraison. The six treatments were applied in a field trial carried out in the Stellenbosch district of the coastal winegrowing region of South Africa over consecutive seasons, between 1990 and 1993. Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraison increased leaf water potential, but did not affect vegetative growth and yield in either cultivar. Relative to a single application at pea size berries, irrigation at pea size, at vraison and during ripening increased berry size in both cultivars, though not consistently, over the three seasons. However, this result must be viewed in terms of the fact that qualitative assessments of root development and distribution have revealed that effective soil preparation contributes to well-developed root systems. Results confirmed that these root systems could sustain vegetative growth and yield where a single irrigation was applied at pea size berries compared with additional irrigations applied at vraison and during ripening. Irrigation applied at, and after, vraison resulted in yield losses of both cultivars when rainfall favoured Botrytis cinerea infection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at pea size and pea size plus vraison increased leaf water potential in Sauvignon blanc

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Sauvignon blanct0e0
Treatment
Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraisone0
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraison increased leaf water potential, but did not affect vegetative growth and yield in either cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These irrigation schedules did not affect vegetative growth and yield in Sauvignon blanc

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Sauvignon blanct0
Treatment
Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraisone0
Outcome
vegetative growth and yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraison increased leaf water potential, but did not affect vegetative growth and yield in either cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at pea size and pea size plus vraison increased leaf water potential in Chenin blanc

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Chenin blanct0e0
Treatment
Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraisone0
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraison increased leaf water potential, but did not affect vegetative growth and yield in either cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These irrigation schedules did not affect vegetative growth and yield in Chenin blanc

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Chenin blanct0
Treatment
Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraisone0
Outcome
vegetative growth and yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at pea size berries and at pea size berries plus vraison increased leaf water potential, but did not affect vegetative growth and yield in either cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional irrigation at vraison and during ripening increased berry size in Sauvignon blanc, inconsistently across seasons.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Sauvignon blanct0
Treatment
irrigation at pea size, at vraison and during ripeninge0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
though not consistently, over the three seasonse0
Comparator
a single application at pea size berriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to a single application at pea size berries, irrigation at pea size, at vraison and during ripening increased berry size in both cultivars, though not consistently, over the three seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional irrigation at vraison and during ripening increased berry size in Chenin blanc, inconsistently across seasons.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Chenin blanct0
Treatment
irrigation at pea size, at vraison and during ripeninge0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
though not consistently, over the three seasonse0
Comparator
a single application at pea size berriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to a single application at pea size berries, irrigation at pea size, at vraison and during ripening increased berry size in both cultivars, though not consistently, over the three seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well-developed root systems sustained vegetative growth and yield with one irrigation at pea size.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
a single irrigation was applied at pea size berriese0
Outcome
vegetative growth and yielde0
Comparator
additional irrigations applied at vraison and during ripeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results confirmed that these root systems could sustain vegetative growth and yield where a single irrigation was applied at pea size berries compared with additional irrigations applied at vraison and during ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at and after vraison caused yield loss in Sauvignon blanc when rainfall favoured Botrytis infection.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Sauvignon blanct0
Treatment
Irrigation applied at, and after, vraisone0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Qualifier
when rainfall favoured Botrytis cinerea infectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation applied at, and after, vraison resulted in yield losses of both cultivars when rainfall favoured Botrytis cinerea infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at and after vraison caused yield loss in Chenin blanc when rainfall favoured Botrytis infection.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Chenin blanct0
Treatment
Irrigation applied at, and after, vraisone0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Qualifier
when rainfall favoured Botrytis cinerea infectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation applied at, and after, vraison resulted in yield losses of both cultivars when rainfall favoured Botrytis cinerea infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Sauvignon blanc and Chenin blanc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–109 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.